CVE-2010-1897
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Windows kernel-mode drivers in win32k.sys in Microsoft Windows XP SP2 and SP3, Windows Server 2003 SP2, Windows Vista SP1 and SP2, Windows Server 2008 Gold, SP2, and R2, and Windows 7 do not properly validate pseudo-handle values in callback parameters during window creation, which allows local users to gain privileges via a crafted application, aka "Win32k Window Creation Vulnerability."
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a local privilege escalation vulnerability in the Windows kernel-mode driver (win32k.sys) that fails to properly validate pseudo-handle values in callback parameters during window creation. A local attacker with the ability to run a crafted application can exploit this to gain elevated (kernel/DATA execution) privileges on affected Windows systems.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Windows versionRun 'winver' or 'systeminfo' from command prompt to obtain the exact Windows version and build numberAffected if The version is Windows XP, Windows Vista, Windows 7, Windows Server 2003, or Windows Server 2008 (any edition)
-
Verify patch KB981852 is installedRun 'wmic qfe list | findstr KB981852' or check registry key HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Component Based Servicing\Packages for the presence of the update package containing KB981852Affected if The KB981852 update is NOT installed on the system
-
Confirm win32k.sys version as secondary indicatorLocate win32k.sys in C:\Windows\System32\ and view file properties to see the version, or run 'wmic datafile where "name=\'C:\\\\Windows\\\\System32\\\\win32k.sys\'" get Version'Affected if The win32k.sys version is older than the version released with MS10-048 patch (this is a supplementary check; patch absence is definitive)
-
Check for presence of exploit-ready local accessReview system security logs and audit policy to determine if untrusted local users have the ability to execute arbitrary code (this vulnerability requires a local attacker to run a crafted application)Affected if Untrusted local users have execution permissions and the system lacks the MS10-048 patch
The system is affected if it runs an unpatched Windows XP, Vista, 7, Server 2003, or Server 2008 installation where KB981852 has not been applied, allowing a local user to potentially escalate privileges via win32k.sys callback validation flaw
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataDeploy Microsoft Security Update MS10-048 to all affected systems, or ensure systems receive the update through WSUS/Windows Update. For legacy systems no longer receiving patches, consider compensating controls such as restricting local user permissions or upgrading to supported Windows versions.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2010-1897 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2010-1897 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data