CVE-2010-2221
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMultiple buffer overflows in the iSNS implementation in isns.c in (1) Linux SCSI target framework (aka tgt or scsi-target-utils) before 1.0.6, (2) iSCSI Enterprise Target (aka iscsitarget or IET) 1.4.20.1 and earlier, and (3) Generic SCSI Target Subsystem for Linux (aka SCST or iscsi-scst) 1.0.1.1 and earlier allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory corruption and daemon crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via (a) a long iSCSI Name string in an SCN message or (b) an invalid PDU.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceMultiple buffer overflow vulnerabilities exist in the iSNS (iSCSI Storage Networking) implementation across three major Linux SCSI target frameworks: tgt, IET, and SCST. The vulnerabilities are triggered by processing a long iSCSI Name string in an SCN (State Change Notification) message or an invalid PDU (Protocol Data Unit), leading to heap or stack buffer overflows. This can result in memory corruption, daemon crash (denial of service), or potentially arbitrary code execution by remote attackers.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 1.0.5= 0.9.5= 1.0.0= 1.0.1= 1.0.2= 1.0.3= 1.0.4<= 1.4.20= 0.1.0= 0.2.0= 0.2.1= 0.2.2= 0.2.3= 0.2.4= 0.2.5= 0.2.6= 0.3.0= 0.3.1= 0.3.2<= 1.0.1= 0.9.0a= 0.9.1= 0.9.2= 0.9.3= 0.9.4= 0.9.5= 0.9.5.1= 0.9.5.2= 1.0.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Partial
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if tgt daemon is installedRun 'dpkg -l | grep tgt' or 'rpm -qa | grep tgt' or check for /usr/sbin/tgtdAffected if tgt version is 0.9.5, 1.0.0, 1.0.1, 1.0.2, 1.0.3, 1.0.4, or 1.0.5 (or any version <= 1.0.5)
-
Identify if iscsitarget (IET) is installedRun 'dpkg -l | grep iscsitarget' or 'rpm -qa | grep iscsitarget' or check for /usr/sbin/ietdAffected if iscsitarget version is 0.1.0, 0.2.0 through 0.2.6, 0.3.0 through 0.3.2, or 1.4.20 (or any version <= 1.4.20)
-
Identify if SCST is installedRun 'modprobe -l | grep scst' or check for /proc/scsi_tgt/scst_version, or run 'scstadmin -version' if availableAffected if SCST version is 0.9.0a, 0.9.1, 0.9.2, 0.9.3, 0.9.4, 0.9.5, 0.9.5.1, 0.9.5.2, 1.0.0, or 1.0.1 (or any version <= 1.0.1)
-
Verify iSNS service is enabledCheck if ietd or tgtd is configured to listen on ports 3205 or 3206 (iSNS), or review /etc/iet/ietd.conf or /etc/tgt/targets.conf for iSNS settingsAffected if The iSCSI target daemon has iSNS protocol support enabled and is listening on iSNS ports
-
Check for remote access to iSNS portsRun 'netstat -tlnp | grep -E "3205|3206"' or 'ss -tlnp | grep -E "3205|3206"' to see if ports 3205/tcp or 3206/tcp are openAffected if Ports 3205 or 3206 are bound to a daemon and accessible from untrusted network segments
The environment is affected if any of tgt (version <= 1.0.5), iscsitarget/IET (version <= 1.4.20), or SCST (version <= 1.0.1) is installed with iSNS enabled and accessible over the network.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade to patched versions of the affected software (tgt 1.0.6+, IET post-1.4.20.1, SCST post-1.0.1.1) or apply vendor-provided security patches. Additionally, restrict network access to iSNS ports (3205, 3206) to trusted sources to reduce attack surface.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,648.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2010-2221 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- archives.neohapsis.com
- archives.neohapsis.com
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.wpkg.org
- scst.svn.sourceforge.net
- scst.svn.sourceforge.net
- sourceforge.net
- www.mandriva.com
- www.osvdb.org
- www.osvdb.org
- www.osvdb.org
- www.redhat.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.securitytracker.com
- www.vupen.com
- www.vupen.com
- bugzilla.redhat.com
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2010-2221 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data