CVE-2010-2568
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedWindows Shell in Microsoft Windows XP SP3, Server 2003 SP2, Vista SP1 and SP2, Server 2008 SP2 and R2, and Windows 7 allows local users or remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted (1) .LNK or (2) .PIF shortcut file, which is not properly handled during icon display in Windows Explorer, as demonstrated in the wild in July 2010, and originally reported for malware that leverages CVE-2010-2772 in Siemens WinCC SCADA systems.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceWindows Shell fails to properly validate .LNK and .PIF shortcut files when rendering their icons in Windows Explorer. Attackers can craft malicious shortcut files that cause Windows to execute arbitrary code when the shortcut's icon is displayed, without requiring user interaction beyond viewing the file in Explorer.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versions= r2all versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Windows versionRun 'winver' or 'systeminfo | findstr /B /C:"OS Name" /C:"OS Version"' to determine the installed Windows version and build number.Affected if The version is Windows XP, Vista, Windows 7, Windows Server 2003, Windows Server 2008, or Windows Server 2008 R2 (all versions of these releases are affected).
-
Check for security update MS10-046Open Control Panel > Programs and Features > View installed updates, or run 'wmic qfe list' or 'Get-HotFix -Id KB2286198' in PowerShell to verify KB2286198 is installed.Affected if The security update KB2286198 (MS10-046) is NOT installed. If missing, the system is vulnerable.
-
Verify subsequent cumulative updatesCheck Windows Update history or run 'wmic qfe list' to list all installed hotfixes. Look for later cumulative updates that supersede MS10-046.Affected if No subsequent security updates containing the LNK/PIF fix are installed. The system remains vulnerable if neither MS10-046 nor later updates are present.
-
Confirm Shell shortcut processing is activeThe vulnerability is triggered when Windows Explorer displays icons for .LNK or .PIF files. This is default behavior; no additional configuration needed for exploitation.Affected if Windows Explorer is used and shortcut files (.LNK, .PIF) exist on the system. Any viewing of these files in Explorer triggers icon processing.
A system is affected if it runs any unpatched version of Windows XP, Vista, 7, Server 2003, Server 2008, or Server 2008 R2 where the MS10-046 (KB2286198) or later superseding security update has not been installed.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply Microsoft Security Bulletin MS10-046 (or subsequent cumulative Windows updates that supersede it) to all affected systems. For SCADA environments, also apply Siemens-specific patches and disable autorun features.
Apply Microsoft security update MS10-046 (for supported systems) or migrate to a supported Windows version
- Apply Microsoft Security Bulletin MS10-046, which addresses the Windows Shell shortcut icon vulnerability (CVE-2010-2568)
- Ensure automatic updates are enabled or manually check for and install the latest Windows security updates
- For Windows XP and Server 2003 which have reached end-of-support, consider upgrading to a supported operating system version if patches are no longer available
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,696.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2010-2568 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2010-2568 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data