CVE-2010-2583
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedStack-based buffer overflow in SonicWALL SSL-VPN End-Point Interrogator/Installer ActiveX control (Aventail.EPInstaller) before 10.5.2 and 10.0.5 hotfix 3 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via long (1) CabURL and (2) Location arguments to the Install3rdPartyComponent method.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceStack-based buffer overflow in SonicWALL SSL-VPN End-Point Interrogator/Installer ActiveX control (Aventail.EPInstaller) allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via overly long CabURL and Location arguments to the Install3rdPartyComponent method, enabling complete system compromise.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 10.5.1= 10.0.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- M
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate the Aventail.EPInstaller ActiveX control on the systemOpen Windows Registry Editor and navigate to HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Classes\CLSID\{ CLSID } or search for 'Aventail.EPInstaller' under HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Classes. The control's CLSID can also be found by searching for 'EPInstaller' in the registry.Affected if The ActiveX control is registered on the system (registry keys exist under CLSID for this control).
-
Determine the installed version of the ActiveX controlOnce the CLSID key is found, check the 'Version' or 'VersionNumber' string value in the registry, or locate the associated DLL file and view its file properties to obtain the version.Affected if The version is 10.5.1 or earlier, or exactly version 10.0.5.
-
Verify if the ActiveX control is enabled in Internet ExplorerOpen Internet Explorer, go to Tools > Internet Options > Security > Custom Level, and check the settings for ActiveX controls. Alternatively, check the Windows registry under 'Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Ext\Settings' for the control's CLSID to see if it is allowed.Affected if The ActiveX control is set to Enabled or Prompt (not Disabled).
-
Confirm the Install3rdPartyComponent method is accessibleCheck the registry key HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Classes\CLSID\{CLSID}\Methods or verify that the control's TypeLib is properly registered, indicating the method interface is exposed.Affected if The Install3rdPartyComponent method is listed and the control's interfaces are properly exposed (not blocked by security policies).
The system is affected if the Aventail.EPInstaller ActiveX control is present, enabled, and its version falls within 10.5.1 or earlier, or exactly 10.0.5.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade SonicWALL SSL-VPN to version 10.5.2 or later, or 10.0.5 hotfix 3 or later; alternatively, disable the Aventail.EPInstaller ActiveX control or implement network-level restrictions until patching is feasible.
SonicWALL SSL-VPN 10.5.2 or later, or 10.0.5 with hotfix 3
- Identify the current version of SonicWALL SSL-VPN End-Point Interrogator/Installer ActiveX control (Aventail.EPInstaller) in the environment
- If the installed version is 10.5.1 or earlier, upgrade to SonicWALL SSL-VPN version 10.5.2 or later
- If the installed version is 10.0.5, apply hotfix 3 for version 10.0.5, or upgrade to a supported version
- Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the ActiveX control version shows 10.5.2 or later, or 10.0.5 with hotfix 3 applied
- Test that the SSL-VPN client functionality works normally after the upgrade
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2010-2583 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2010-2583 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data