CVE-2010-2977
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCisco Unified Wireless Network (UWN) Solution 7.x before 7.0.98.0 does not properly implement TLS and SSL, which has unspecified impact and remote attack vectors, aka Bug ID CSCtd01611.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceCisco Unified Wireless Network (UWN) Solution versions 7.x prior to 7.0.98.0 contain improper TLS/SSL implementation vulnerabilities allowing remote attackers to exploit unspecified attack vectors, resulting in critical-impact compromises (CVSS 10).
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 7.0= 7.0.98.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Cisco UWN Solution installationLocate Cisco Wireless LAN Controllers (WLC) or lightweight access points (LAPs) in your environment. These are the core components of the Cisco Unified Wireless Network Solution. Check network documentation or physically inspect data center racks for Cisco WLC devices model numbers such as 5500, 4400, or 2500 series controllers.Affected if N/A - this step identifies if the product is present
-
Check UWN Solution software versionOn the Cisco Wireless LAN Controller, access the CLI and run the 'show version' command, or access the web interface and navigate to Monitor > Controller > Software Version. Record the exact software version number displayed.Affected if N/A - this step identifies the installed version for comparison
-
Compare version against affected rangeCompare the installed version to the affected range: versions 7.0 and any 7.x version prior to 7.0.98.0. Note that version 7.0.98.0 itself is NOT affected.Affected if If the installed version is 7.0.x where x is less than 98, or exactly version 7.0, the system is vulnerable to the TLS/SSL implementation flaws
-
Verify TLS/SSL services are in useCheck if the Wireless LAN Controller has web-based management (HTTP/HTTPS), telnet, or SSH enabled. Run 'show service内部的' in the WLC CLI to see enabled management interfaces. The vulnerability affects TLS/SSL implementation, so these services must be accessible for exploitation.Affected if If HTTPS or other TLS/SSL protected management interfaces are enabled and the version is in the affected range, the TLS/SSL flaws can be exploited
A system is affected if it runs Cisco Unified Wireless Network Solution Software version 7.0 or any 7.x version prior to 7.0.98.0, with TLS/SSL management services exposed.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade Cisco UWN Solution to version 7.0.98.0 or later to address the TLS/SSL implementation deficiencies; if upgrade is not feasible, isolate affected systems and monitor for indicators of compromise.
Cisco UWN Solution 7.0.98.0 or later
- 1. Identify the current Cisco UWN Solution software version via the Wireless Control System (WCS) or Wireless LAN Controller (WLC) CLI
- 2. Access the Cisco Software Download center at software.cisco.com
- 3. Download Cisco UWN Solution version 7.0.98.0 or later
- 4. Backup the current WCS/WLC configuration
- 5. Upgrade the Wireless LAN Controller to the fixed version via the CLI or web interface
- 6. Verify the TLS/SSL configuration after upgrade to ensure proper implementation
- 7. Confirm the upgrade was successful and test wireless network functionality
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,616.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2010-2977 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2010-2977 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data