CVE-2010-3041
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMultiple buffer overflows in the Cisco WebEx Recording Format (WRF) and Advanced Recording Format (ARF) Players T27LB before SP21 EP3 and T27LC before SP22 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted (1) .wrf or (2) .arf file, related to atas32.dll, a different vulnerability than CVE-2010-3042, CVE-2010-3043, and CVE-2010-3044.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceMultiple buffer overflow vulnerabilities exist in the atas32.dll library used by Cisco WebEx WRF and ARF Players (T27LB before SP21 EP3 and T27LC before SP22). Attackers can exploit these by tricking users into opening specially crafted .wrf or .arf files, potentially leading to arbitrary code execution or denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 26.49= 27.10= 27.11.0.3328= 27.12= 27.13= 26.49= 27.10= 27.11.0.3328= 27.12= 27.13CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- M
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify WebEx WRF or ARF Player is installedCheck for the presence of Cisco WebEx player software in Program Files (e.g., C:\Program Files\WebEx\WebEx Recording Format Player or similar paths), or look in Windows registry under HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall for WebEx entriesAffected if No WebEx player software is found, then the system is not affected by this specific vulnerability
-
Locate the atas32.dll librarySearch for atas32.dll in the WebEx player installation directory (commonly C:\Program Files\WebEx\ or subdirectories). Use command: dir /s C:\ProgramFiles\atas32.dll or review the application's installation folderAffected if The atas32.dll file does not exist, the vulnerable library is not present
-
Determine atas32.dll versionRight-click atas32.dll, select Properties, then look at the Version tab to find the File Version. Alternatively, use a tool like sigcheck or PowerShell: (Get-Item 'C:\Path\to\atas32.dll').VersionInfoAffected if The file version matches 26.49, 27.10, 27.11.0.3328, 27.12, or 27.13, indicating a vulnerable version
-
Determine WebEx player versionOpen the installed WebEx Recording Format Player or ARF Player, go to Help > About, or check the registry under HKLM\SOFTWARE\WebEx for version entriesAffected if The player version is T27LB before SP21 EP3, or T27LC before SP22, or matches versions 26.49, 27.10, 27.11.0.3328, 27.12, or 27.13
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply vendor-supplied patches (T27LB SP21 EP3 or later, T27LC SP22 or later) and exercise caution when opening recording files from untrusted sources.
T27LB SP21 EP3 or later / T27LC SP22 or later
- 1. Identify the exact Cisco WebEx Player version installed (T27LB or T27LC build)
- 2. For T27LB users: Obtain and apply Service Pack 21 EP3 (SP21 EP3) or later from Cisco
- 3. For T27LC users: Obtain and apply Service Pack 22 (SP22) or later from Cisco
- 4. Verify the patch was applied successfully by checking the player version
- 5. Restart any running WebEx player instances
- 6. Test with a legitimate WRF/ARF file to confirm functionality
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2010-3041 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2010-3041 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data