CVE-2010-3453
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe WW8ListManager::WW8ListManager function in oowriter in OpenOffice.org (OOo) 2.x and 3.x before 3.3 does not properly handle an unspecified number of list levels in user-defined list styles in WW8 data in a Microsoft Word document, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted .DOC file that triggers an out-of-bounds write.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe WW8ListManager::WW8ListManager function in OpenOffice.org Writer fails to properly validate the number of list levels when parsing user-defined list styles in WW8 (Word 97-2003) format documents. A specially crafted .DOC file with an unspecified number of list levels triggers an out-of-bounds write, leading to potential code execution or denial of service (application crash).
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 2.0.0, < 3.3.0= 8.04= 9.10= 10.04= 10.10= 5.0= 6.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- M
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify OpenOffice Writer versionRun 'about' command in OpenOffice Writer or check installed package version (e.g., dpkg -l | grep openoffice-writer or rpm -qa | grep openoffice)Affected if Version is between 2.0.0 and 3.2.x (inclusive)
-
Verify WW8 document import capability existsCheck if the WW8 (Word 97-2003) import filter is installed; look for files named ww8*.dll, ww8*.so, or check OpenOffice filter configuration for 'MS Word 97' or 'WW8' entryAffected if WW8/Word 97 import filter is present and enabled
-
Confirm default file associations for .DOCCheck system file associations or OpenOffice preferences to verify .DOC files are set to open with Writer by defaultAffected if .DOC files can be opened directly in OpenOffice Writer
-
Assess exposure to untrusted documentsReview document handling practices: check if users commonly open .DOC files from external sources, email attachments, or untrusted network locationsAffected if Users open .DOC files from untrusted or external sources without prior validation
User is affected if OpenOffice Writer version is 2.0.0 through 3.2.x AND the WW8 import filter is enabled AND users can open untrusted Word 97-2003 .DOC files.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped3.3.0
Upgrade to OpenOffice.org 3.3 or later; avoid opening untrusted Microsoft Word .DOC files in vulnerable versions until the patch is applied.
OpenOffice.org 3.3.0 or later
- Download OpenOffice.org 3.3.0 or later from the official Apache OpenOffice website (https://www.openoffice.org/download/)
- Uninstall the existing OpenOffice version using your system's package manager (e.g., 'apt-get remove openoffice.org*' on Debian/Ubuntu)
- Install the downloaded OpenOffice 3.3.0 or newer version using your system's package manager or the provided installer
- Verify the installation by checking the version (e.g., 'openoffice --version' or through the application menu)
- Ensure all security updates for your operating system are applied to maintain system integrity
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,720.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2010-3453 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- www.openoffice.org
- ubuntu.com
- www.debian.org
- www.gentoo.org
- www.oracle.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.securitytracker.com
- bugzilla.redhat.com
- osvdb.org
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- www.cs.brown.edu
- www.mandriva.com
- www.redhat.com
- www.redhat.com
- www.vsecurity.com
- www.vupen.com
- www.vupen.com
- www.vupen.com
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2010-3453 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data