CVE-2010-3588
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUnspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Discoverer component in Oracle Fusion Middleware 10.1.2.3, 11.1.1.2.0, and 11.1.1.3.0 allows remote authenticated users to affect confidentiality and integrity, related to EUL Code & Schema.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceOracle Discoverer contains an unspecified vulnerability in the EUL (End User Layer) Code & Schema component affecting versions 10.1.2.3, 11.1.1.2.0, and 11.1.1.3.0. The vulnerability allows remote authenticated users to impact confidentiality and integrity but not availability, with CVSS vector indicating network attack vector, low complexity, and low privileges required.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 10.1.2.3= 11.1.1.2.0= 11.1.1.3.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- Single
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- None
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if Oracle Discoverer is installedCheck for Oracle Discoverer installation directories (typically ORACLE_HOME/Discoverer) or look for Discoverer processes and services on the system.Affected if Oracle Discoverer software is present on the system
-
Determine installed Oracle Discoverer versionCheck the version of the Discoverer installation. Common locations: ORACLE_HOME/Discoverer/version.txt, or use Oracle Inventory (run 'opatch lsinventory' or check $ORACLE_HOME/inventory/ContentsXML/oraclehome.xml).Affected if Installed version matches 10.1.2.3, 11.1.1.2.0, or 11.1.1.3.0 exactly
-
Confirm EUL (End User Layer) component is configuredCheck if the EUL schema and code component is in use. Look for EUL-related database objects (check for EUL tables in the database, typically under EUL5, EUL4, or similar schemas) or check Discoverer Administrator configuration files.Affected if EUL component is deployed and accessible
-
Verify network accessibility of Discoverer servicesCheck if Oracle Discoverer Listener (disc4o or discweb) ports are exposed on network interfaces. Review firewall rules and listener configuration (listener.ora). Common ports: 80, 443, or custom ports for Discoverer.Affected if Discoverer services are reachable over the network from untrusted segments
A user is affected if Oracle Discoverer with EUL component is installed and the installed version is exactly 10.1.2.3, 11.1.1.2.0, or 11.1.1.3.0 with network accessibility.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply Oracle Critical Patch Update addressing CVE-2010-3588; if immediate patching is not feasible, restrict network access to Oracle Discoverer services and enforce least-privilege access controls on EUL user accounts.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2010-3588 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2010-3588 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data