CVE-2010-3733
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Engine Utilities component in IBM DB2 UDB 9.5 before FP6a uses world-writable permissions for the sqllib/cfg/db2sprf file, which might allow local users to gain privileges by modifying this file.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIBM DB2 UDB 9.5 before FP6a has incorrect file permissions on the sqllib/cfg/db2sprf file in the Engine Utilities component. This file is world-writable, allowing any local user to modify it and potentially escalate privileges by injecting malicious content that executes with elevated DB2 privileges.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 9.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate DB2 installation directoryRun 'db2pd -' or check common paths like /opt/ibm/db2V95, /home/db2inst1/sqllib, or the output of 'db2 get instance' to find the DB2 instance home directory. Look for the sqllib subdirectory.Affected if DB2 9.5 is not installed - not vulnerable
-
Identify DB2 version and fix pack levelExecute 'db2level' or 'db2pd -version' from a DB2 instance user. Parse the output to extract the version number (9.5) and fix pack level (e.g., FP5, FP6, FP6a).Affected if Version is 9.5 with fix pack before FP6a (e.g., FP5, FP4, etc.) - likely vulnerable
-
Check permissions on db2sprf fileFrom the DB2 instance directory, run 'ls -la sqllib/cfg/db2sprf' to inspect the file permissions. Look for the permission string (e.g., -rw-rw-rw- indicates world-writable).Affected if File shows world-writable permissions (rw-rw-rw- or similar where 'other' has write permission) - vulnerable
A system is affected if DB2 version 9.5 with a fix pack earlier than FP6a is installed AND the sqllib/cfg/db2sprf file has world-writable permissions (write access granted to 'other' or 'everyone').
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply DB2 Fix Pack 6a or later which corrects the file permissions on sqllib/cfg/db2sprf to restrict write access to owner/group only.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2010-3733 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2010-3733 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data