CVE-2010-3924
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedSQL injection vulnerability in Aimluck Aipo before 5.1.0.1 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary SQL commands via unspecified vectors.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in Aimluck Aipo versions prior to 5.1.0.1 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary SQL commands through unspecified input vectors. The vulnerability stems from improper handling of user-supplied data in database queries, enabling attackers to inject malicious SQL statements.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 5.1= 4.0.1.0= 4.0.2.0= 4.0.3.0= 4.0.4.0= 4.0.5.0= 5.0.0.0= 5.0.1.0= 5.0.2.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Aimluck Aipo installationLook for Aimluck Aipo installation directories or running services on the system. Common locations include /opt/aipo, /usr/local/aipo, or check running Java processes for aipo-related applications.Affected if Aimluck Aipo is found installed on the system
-
Determine installed versionLocate the version information file or check the application startup script. Typically found in version.properties, aipo.version file, or the administration interface under system settings.Affected if The installed version cannot be determined or is below 5.1.0.1
-
Compare version against affected rangesCheck if the installed version matches any of these: versions 4.0.1.0, 4.0.2.0, 4.0.3.0, 4.0.4.0, 4.0.5.0, 5.0.0.0, 5.0.1.0, 5.0.2.0, or any version <= 5.1.Affected if The installed version is one of the affected versions listed or is <= 5.1 but earlier than 5.1.0.1
-
Verify remote access is enabledConfirm that the application is configured to accept remote network connections. Check the server configuration or firewall rules to determine if the aipo web interface is accessible from external networks.Affected if The application is network-accessible and accepts remote connections
The environment is affected if Aimluck Aipo is installed with a version <= 5.1 (prior to 5.1.0.1) and the application is accessible to remote authenticated users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade Aimluck Aipo to version 5.1.0.1 or later, which contains the patch for this vulnerability. If immediate patching is not feasible, implement input validation and parameterized queries as a temporary mitigation.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2010-3924 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2010-3924 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data