CVE-2010-4045
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedOpera before 10.63 does not properly restrict web script in unspecified circumstances involving reloads and redirects, which allows remote attackers to spoof the Address Bar, conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks, and possibly execute arbitrary code by leveraging the ability of a script to interact with a web page from (1) a different domain or (2) a different security context.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceOpera browser versions before 10.63 fail to properly restrict web script behavior during page reloads and redirects. This allows scripts to interact across different domains or security contexts, enabling attackers to spoof the Address Bar, conduct XSS attacks, and potentially execute arbitrary code.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 10.62= 5.0= 5.02= 5.10= 5.11= 5.12= 6.0= 6.1= 6.01= 6.02= 6.03= 6.04CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- M
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Opera browser versionLaunch Opera, click Help menu, select About Opera to view the exact version number. Alternatively, run 'opera --version' from command prompt or terminal if available.Affected if Unable to retrieve version information
-
Compare against vulnerable versionsVerify if the installed version is 10.62 or lower, or matches any of: 5.0, 5.02, 5.10, 5.11, 5.12, 6.0, 6.1, 6.01, 6.02, 6.03, 6.04Affected if Version matches any affected release listed
-
Confirm script execution is enabledThis vulnerability exploits improper script handling during page reloads and redirects. Check that JavaScript is enabled in Opera settings (Preferences > Advanced > Content), as the flaw requires script execution to be active.Affected if JavaScript is enabled and browser version is vulnerable
The environment is affected if Opera version is 10.62 or below, or one of the specific older versions (5.0, 5.02, 5.10, 5.11, 5.12, 6.0, 6.1, 6.01, 6.02, 6.03, 6.04), and JavaScript is enabled
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade Opera to version 10.63 or later to resolve the script restriction vulnerability. If upgrade is not feasible, consider migrating to a supported browser.
Opera 10.63 or later / current Opera browser
- Upgrade Opera Browser to version 10.63 or later to resolve the script restriction vulnerability
- If using legacy Opera 10.x, ensure the version is 10.63 or higher
- For modern systems, consider upgrading to current Opera browser versions (now Chromium-based) which do not have this vulnerability
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2010-4045 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2010-4045 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data