Tivoli Directory ServerApplication · Ibm

CVE-2010-4217

MEDIUM · 5.0 CVSS v2.0 Published 2010-11-09
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
59/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Use-after-free vulnerability in the proxy server in IBM Tivoli Directory Server (TDS) 6.0.0.x before 6.0.0.8-TIV-ITDS-IF0007 and 6.1.x before 6.1.0-TIV-ITDS-FP0005 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) via an unbind request that occurs during a certain search operation.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A use-after-free vulnerability exists in the proxy server component of IBM Tivoli Directory Server versions 6.0.0.x before 6.0.0.8-TIV-ITDS-IF0007 and 6.1.x before 6.1.0-TIV-ITDS-FP0005. The flaw is triggered when a remote attacker sends an unbind request during an active search operation, causing the server to reference freed memory and crash.

MitigationApply the appropriate IBM interim fix (6.0.0.8-TIV-ITDS-IF0007) or fix pack (6.1.0-TIV-ITDS-FP0005) per the IBM Tivoli Directory Server version in use. Consider restricting network access to the directory server proxy port until patching is completed.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Tivoli Directory ServerApplication
Affected:= 6.0.0.0= 6.0.0.1= 6.0.0.7= 6.0.0.8= 6.0.0.14= 6.0.0.19= 6.0.0.33= 6.0.0.41= 6.0.0.45= 6.0.0.52= 6.0.0.53= 6.0.0.54

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
Partial

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check installed IBM Tivoli Directory Server version
    Run 'idsversion' command or check the version through the IBM Directory Server administration console, or inspect the version file in the installation directory (typically in /opt/ibm/ldap/V6.X/ or the installation root)
    Affected if Version is 6.0.0.x before fix level 6.0.0.8-TIV-ITDS-IF0007, or version 6.1.x before fix level 6.1.0-TIV-ITDS-FP0005, or matches one of the specific affected builds listed (6.0.0.0, 6.0.0.1, 6.0.0.7, 6.0.0.8, 6.0.0.14, 6.0.0.19, 6.0.0.33, 6.0.0.41, 6.0.0.45, 6.0.0.52, 6.0.0.53, 6.0.0.54)
  2. Verify proxy server component is configured
    Check if the LDAP proxy server is enabled by reviewing the IBM Tivoli Directory Server configuration files (ibmslapd.conf or ibmslapd.dcc) in the instance directory, or query the server for proxy functionality using ldapsearch on the administration port
    Affected if Proxy server functionality is enabled and the server is listening on a proxy port (commonly port 389 or 636)
  3. Confirm active search operations can reach the proxy
    Verify the proxy port is accessible by running 'ldapsearch -h <server> -p <proxy_port> -b <base_dn> -s base objectclass=*' or by checking network listeners with 'netstat -an | grep <port>'
    Affected if The proxy port is open and accepts LDAP connections

You are affected if you are running a vulnerable version of IBM Tivoli Directory Server (6.0.0.x before 6.0.0.8-TIV-ITDS-IF0007 or 6.1.x before 6.1.0-TIV-ITDS-FP0005) AND the proxy server component is enabled and accessible on the network.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply the appropriate IBM interim fix (6.0.0.8-TIV-ITDS-IF0007) or fix pack (6.1.0-TIV-ITDS-FP0005) per the IBM Tivoli Directory Server version in use. Consider restricting network access to the directory server proxy port until patching is completed.

Fix this in Tivoli Directory Server Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
15.0 hours of engineering $2,580
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,128.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2010-4217 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2010-4217 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data