ClamavApplication

CVE-2010-4261

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v2.0 Published 2010-12-07
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 0.96.4 or later.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Off-by-one error in the icon_cb function in pe_icons.c in libclamav in ClamAV before 0.96.5 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory corruption and application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors. NOTE: some of these details are obtained from third party information.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

An off-by-one error exists in the icon_cb function in pe_icons.c within libclamav, affecting ClamAV versions prior to 0.96.5. This memory corruption vulnerability in the PE icon parsing logic can be triggered remotely, potentially allowing attackers to crash the application or execute arbitrary code through specially crafted PE files with malformed icon data.

MitigationUpgrade ClamAV to version 0.96.5 or later to patch the vulnerability. If immediate patching is not possible, consider restricting or disabling the scanning of untrusted PE files until the update can be applied.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
ClamavApplication
Affected:<= 0.96.4= 0.01= 0.02= 0.3= 0.03= 0.05= 0.8= 0.9= 0.10= 0.12= 0.13= 0.14

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
Partial
Availability
Partial

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check if ClamAV is installed
    Run 'clamd --version' or 'clamscan --version' to confirm ClamAV is present on the system
    Affected if ClamAV is not installed, then the vulnerability does not apply to this system
  2. Determine installed ClamAV version
    Execute 'clamd --version' or 'clamscan --version' and note the version number displayed (e.g., 0.96.4, 0.96.3, etc.)
    Affected if The version is less than 0.96.5 (any version from 0.01 through 0.96.4 or listed affected versions) - compare your version to the vulnerable range
  3. Verify libclamav PE scanning is enabled
    Check clamd.conf or clamscan configuration for the presence of the 'DetectPUA' option or PE parsing-related settings; PE icon parsing occurs during PE file scanning which is enabled by default in ClamAV
    Affected if PE scanning is disabled (not typical default), though the vulnerability still exists in the library code even if not actively invoked
  4. Confirm the vulnerable pe_icons.c component exists
    Locate libclamav library file (typically /usr/lib/libclamav.so or similar path) and verify the pe_icons.c compiled code is present within the installed ClamAV version
    Affected if The library contains the icon_cb function from pe_icons.c and the version is < 0.96.5

The system is affected if ClamAV is installed with a version lower than 0.96.5 and the PE scanning module (containing the vulnerable icon_cb function in libclamav) is present and operational.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 0.96.4
Interim mitigation

Upgrade ClamAV to version 0.96.5 or later to patch the vulnerability. If immediate patching is not possible, consider restricting or disabling the scanning of untrusted PE files until the update can be applied.

Fix this in Clamav Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
7.0 hours of engineering $1,240
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2010-4261 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2010-4261 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data