dbcve.org
Linux Imaging And Printing ProjectApplication · Hp

CVE-2010-4267

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v2.0 Published 2011-01-20
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Stack-based buffer overflow in the hpmud_get_pml function in io/hpmud/pml.c in Hewlett-Packard Linux Imaging and Printing (HPLIP) 1.6.7, 3.9.8, 3.10.9, and probably other versions allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted SNMP response with a large length value.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Stack-based buffer overflow in the hpmud_get_pml function in HP's PML printer communication code (io/hpmud/pml.c) allows remote attackers to cause denial of service or potentially execute arbitrary code via a crafted SNMP response with a large length value.

MitigationUpdate HPLIP to a patched version; if unavailable, restrict network access to printers and disable SNMP-based printer discovery to reduce attack surface.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Linux Imaging And Printing ProjectApplication
Affected:= 1.6.7= 3.9.8= 3.10.9

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
Partial
Availability
Partial

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm HPLIP is installed
    Check for the HP Linux Imaging and Printing package. On Debian-based systems: dpkg -l | grep hplip. On Red Hat-based systems: rpm -qa | grep hplip. On SUSE: rpm -qa | grep hplip. Alternatively, run hp-setup --version or hp-info --version if available.
    Affected if HPLIP package is found on the system
  2. Identify installed HPLIP version
    Run hp-setup --version or hp-info --version to display the installed HPLIP version number. Compare this against the affected versions: 1.6.7, 3.9.8, and 3.10.9.
    Affected if Installed version equals exactly 1.6.7, 3.9.8, or 3.10.9
  3. Verify PML over SNMP functionality
    Check if the system has network HP printers configured that use SNMP for discovery or communication. Use hp-probe -b net or examine /etc/hp/hplip.conf for snmp settings. The vulnerability is in the hpmud_get_pml function handling SNMP responses.
    Affected if Network printers are configured and SNMP-based printer discovery is enabled in HPLIP settings

System is affected if HPLIP version is exactly 1.6.7, 3.9.8, or 3.10.9 and network printer communication via SNMP/PML is in use.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Update HPLIP to a patched version; if unavailable, restrict network access to printers and disable SNMP-based printer discovery to reduce attack surface.

Fix this in Linux Imaging And Printing Project Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
18.0 hours of engineering $3,200
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2010-4267 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

Get it on GitHub Scan in the browser

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2010-4267 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data