CVE-2010-4495
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUnspecified vulnerability in the ActiveMatrix Runtime component in TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Grid 3.0.0, 3.0.1, and 3.1.0; ActiveMatrix Service Bus 3.0.0 and 3.0.1; ActiveMatrix BusinessWorks Service Engine 5.9.0; ActiveMatrix BPM 1.0.1 and 1.0.2; Silver BPM Service 1.0.1; and Silver CAP Service 1.0.0 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code via vectors related to JMX connections.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA JMX (Java Management Extensions) connection vulnerability in TIBCO ActiveMatrix Runtime allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code. This affects multiple ActiveMatrix products including Service Grid, Service Bus, BusinessWorks Service Engine, and BPM components. The attack requires authentication but can lead to complete system compromise.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0.1= 1.0.2= 5.9.0= 3.0.0= 3.0.1= 3.0.0= 3.0.1= 3.1.0= 1.0.1= 1.0.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- Single
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed TIBCO ActiveMatrix productsLocate TIBCO installation directories and check for ActiveMatrix components such as Service Grid, Service Bus, BusinessWorks Service Engine, BPM, or Silver family products. Use product inventory or system discovery tools to list all TIBCO software installations.Affected if Any of the following products are installed: ActiveMatrix BPM (versions 1.0.1 or 1.0.2), BusinessWorks Service Engine (version 5.9.0), Service Bus (versions 3.0.0 or 3.0.1), Service Grid (versions 3.0.0, 3.0.1, or 3.1.0), Silver BPM Service (version 1.0.1), or Silver CAP Service (version 1.0.0).
-
Determine product version numbersCheck the version information for each TIBCO ActiveMatrix component installed. This is typically found in product-specific manifest files, about dialogs, or version logs within each product's installation directory.Affected if Installed version numbers match the specific versions listed in the affected products list for any ActiveMatrix component.
-
Verify JMX remote management is enabledExamine JMX configuration files (such as jmxremote.properties, jmxremote.access, or product-specific configuration XML files) in the TIBCO ActiveMatrix installation directories. Check for JMX service URL configurations that enable remote JMX connections.Affected if JMX remote management is enabled and configured to accept remote connections, which is required for this vulnerability to be exploitable.
-
Inspect JMX authentication settingsReview JMX configuration to determine whether authentication is enforced for JMX connections. Check for the presence and proper configuration of jmxremote.password file and verify that authentication is not disabled or set to optional.Affected if JMX authentication is disabled, weakly configured, or uses default credentials, allowing authenticated attackers to leverage the JMX interface for code execution.
The environment is affected if any TIBCO ActiveMatrix product matching the specific affected versions is installed AND JMX remote management is enabled with inadequate authentication controls.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataRestrict JMX access through network segmentation and authentication controls; apply vendor patches for affected versions (3.0.0-3.1.0 for Service Grid/Bus, 5.9.0 for BusinessWorks, 1.0.1-1.0.2 for BPM). If patching is not immediately feasible, disable unauthenticated JMX remoting and enforce TLS for JMX connections.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing16.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $11,008.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2010-4495 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2010-4495 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data