CVE-2011-0281
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe unparse implementation in the Key Distribution Center (KDC) in MIT Kerberos 5 (aka krb5) 1.6.x through 1.9, when an LDAP backend is used, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (file descriptor exhaustion and daemon hang) via a principal name that triggers use of a backslash escape sequence, as demonstrated by a \n sequence.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA denial of service vulnerability exists in the KDC unparse function in MIT Kerberos 5 versions 1.6 through 1.9 when using an LDAP backend. Attackers can trigger file descriptor exhaustion by sending principal names containing backslash escape sequences (such as \n), causing the daemon to hang.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 5-1.6.3= 1.6= 1.6.1= 1.6.2= 1.7= 1.7.1= 1.8= 1.8.1= 1.8.2= 1.8.3= 1.9CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Partial
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed MIT Kerberos 5 versionRun 'krb5-config --version' or check the package manager (rpm -q krb5-server or dpkg -l krb5-kdc)Affected if Version is 1.6, 1.6.1, 1.6.2, 1.6.3, 1.7, 1.7.1, 1.8, 1.8.1, 1.8.2, 1.8.3, or 1.9
-
Verify KDC service is runningCheck for krb5kdc process (ps aux | grep krb5kdc) or query systemd (systemctl status krb5-kdc)Affected if KDC daemon is active and serving requests
-
Confirm LDAP backend is in useExamine /var/kerberos/krb5kdc/kdc.conf or /etc/krb5.conf for 'ldap_kdc_dn' or 'ldap_kerberos_container_dn' directives under the [kdcdefaults] or [realms] sectionsAffected if LDAP is configured as the Kerberos database backend (not db2 or other file-based backends)
You are affected if you run MIT Kerberos 5 versions 1.6 through 1.9 with an LDAP backend configured and the KDC is actively running.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade to krb5 1.10 or later, or apply vendor patches. If immediate patching is not possible, consider restricting access to the KDC and implementing network-level filtering to limit unusual principal name patterns.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2011-0281 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- web.mit.edu
- www.vupen.com
- www.vupen.com
- www.vupen.com
- lists.opensuse.org
- mailman.mit.edu
- secunia.com
- securityreason.com
- www.mandriva.com
- www.mandriva.com
- www.redhat.com
- www.redhat.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.securitytracker.com
- www.vmware.com
- www.vupen.com
- exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2011-0281 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data