MaradnsApplication

CVE-2011-0520

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v2.0 Published 2011-01-28
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The compress_add_dlabel_points function in dns/Compress.c in MaraDNS 1.4.03, 1.4.05, and probably other versions allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (segmentation fault) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a long DNS hostname with a large number of labels, which triggers a heap-based buffer overflow.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Heap-based buffer overflow in the compress_add_dlabel_points function in MaraDNS's Compress.c allows remote attackers to cause denial of service or possibly execute arbitrary code by sending DNS queries with hostnames containing a large number of labels.

MitigationUpdate MaraDNS to a patched version that properly bounds-checks the hostname compression logic, or implement DNS query filtering at network perimeter to reject unusually long or label-heavy DNS names.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
MaradnsApplication
Affected:= 1.4.03= 1.4.05

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
Partial
Availability
Partial

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify MaraDNS installation and version
    Check if MaraDNS is installed by looking for the executable (e.g., 'which maradns' or 'which dns'), or check installed packages. Query the DNS server for its version if possible, or check the binary/package version using your system's package manager.
    Affected if The installed MaraDNS version is 1.4.03 or 1.4.05 exactly, or if the exact version cannot be determined but falls within the 1.4.x range and matches the affected versions.
  2. Verify MaraDNS service is running
    Check if MaraDNS is actively running as a DNS service. Use commands like 'ps aux | grep -i mara' or check if DNS port 53 is listening (e.g., 'netstat -tlnp | grep :53' or 'ss -tlnp | grep :53').
    Affected if MaraDNS is running and listening on DNS ports (typically port 53 UDP/TCP), making it exposed to network queries.
  3. Confirm the vulnerable compression function exists
    Inspect the Compress.c source file if accessible, or check the binary for the compress_add_dlabel_points function symbol. If MaraDNS is compiled from source, verify the presence of the vulnerable code path in the Compress.c file.
    Affected if The compress_add_dlabel_points function is present in the MaraDNS build and is used during DNS hostname compression operations.
  4. Assess network exposure
    Determine if the MaraDNS instance is reachable from network locations. Check firewall rules, bind address configuration in MaraDNS config (typically csv4 or json format), and whether the service is bound to public IPs versus localhost only.
    Affected if The MaraDNS DNS service is accessible from untrusted networks, allowing remote attackers to send specially crafted DNS queries with many labels.

You are affected if MaraDNS version 1.4.03 or 1.4.05 is running and accessible on the network, enabling remote attackers to trigger the heap overflow via DNS queries with hostnames containing many labels.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Update MaraDNS to a patched version that properly bounds-checks the hostname compression logic, or implement DNS query filtering at network perimeter to reject unusually long or label-heavy DNS names.

Fix this in Maradns Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
11.0 hours of engineering $1,930
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2011-0520 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2011-0520 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data