CVE-2011-0658
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedInteger underflow in the OLE Automation protocol implementation in VBScript.dll in Microsoft Windows XP SP2 and SP3, Windows Server 2003 SP2, Windows Vista SP1 and SP2, Windows Server 2008 Gold, SP2, R2, and R2 SP1, and Windows 7 Gold and SP1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted WMF file, aka "OLE Automation Underflow Vulnerability."
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceInteger underflow vulnerability in VBScript.dll's OLE Automation component allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via specially crafted WMF (Windows Metafile) files. The vulnerability affects multiple Windows versions from XP through 7 and Server 2003-2008 R2, with a critical CVSS score of 9.3 indicating low attack complexity and network exploitability.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versions= r2all versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- M
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Windows version is affectedRun 'winver' or 'systeminfo' from command prompt to identify the Windows version. Check if it is XP, Vista, 7, Server 2003, Server 2008, or Server 2008 R2.Affected if The system runs any version of Windows XP, Vista, 7, Server 2003, Server 2008, or Server 2008 R2
-
Verify VBScript.dll is presentCheck for the presence of VBScript.dll in the system. Typical path: C:\Windows\System32\VBScript.dll or C:\Windows\SysWOW64\VBScript.dll (on 64-bit systems for 32-bit).Affected if VBScript.dll exists on the system (required for the vulnerability)
-
Check if MS11-027 security update is appliedRun 'wmic qfe list' or check Windows Update history for security update KB2507938 (the MS11-027 patch that addresses this CVE).Affected if The system is missing KB2507938 or MS11-027 update, meaning the integer underflow vulnerability is unpatched
-
Verify VBScript execution is enabledCheck browser or application settings where VBScript may execute. In Internet Explorer, go to Internet Options > Security > Custom Level and check 'Active scripting' settings.Affected if VBScript or Active scripting is enabled in browsers or applications that process WMF files
-
Confirm WMF file handling is possibleCheck if applications are configured to handle or display WMF files (Windows Metafile). Review file association settings or email/web gateway configurations for WMF processing.Affected if The system or associated applications can process WMF files, which is the attack vector for this vulnerability
The system is affected if it runs an unpatched Windows XP/Vista/7/Server 2003/2008/2008 R2 with VBScript.dll present, missing the MS11-027 (KB2507938) update, and has VBScript execution enabled for processing WMF files.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply Microsoft security update MS11-027 to remediate the integer underflow in VBScript.dll. Until patched, consider disabling VBScript execution or implementing WMF file blocking at email/web gateways to reduce attack surface.
Install Microsoft Security Bulletin MS11-024 patch (KB2496898) for your specific Windows version and service pack level
- Open Microsoft Update or Windows Update on the affected system
- Check for available security updates
- Locate and install Microsoft Security Bulletin MS11-024 (or KB2496898) which addresses the OLE Automation Underflow vulnerability (CVE-2011-0658)
- Restart the system after installing the update
- Verify the update was successfully installed by checking installed updates
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,448.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2011-0658 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2011-0658 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data