CVE-2011-10035
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedNagios XI versions prior to 2011R1.9 contain privilege escalation vulnerabilities in the scripts that install or update system crontab entries. Due to time-of-check/time-of-use race conditions and missing synchronization or final-path validation, a local low-privileged user could manipulate filesystem state during crontab installation to influence the files or commands executed with elevated privileges, resulting in execution with higher privileges.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceNagios XI versions prior to 2011R1.9 contain TOCTOU race conditions in crontab installation scripts. A local low-privileged user can manipulate filesystem state during the window between permission checks and file operations to inject malicious content into commands that execute with elevated (root) privileges, achieving privilege escalation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 2009= 2011CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Nagios XI versionRun: cat /usr/local/nagiosxi/etc/xiversion.txt or check the Nagios XI admin interface under 'About' pageAffected if Version is 2009, 2010, 2011, or any version prior to 2011R1.9
-
Locate crontab installation scriptsSearch for scripts in /usr/local/nagiosxi/scripts/ or /etc/cron.d/nagiosxi related to crontab installation. Common files: installcrontab.sh, nagiosxi.cron, or similarAffected if Scripts exist and their modification timestamps predate the 2011R1.9 release
-
Inspect crontab script for TOCTOU vulnerable code patternsExamine the installation scripts for sequences where file permissions are checked (using test, [ -w ], or stat) before file operations (cp, mv, chown) without atomic operations or lockingAffected if Scripts show separate permission check commands followed by file manipulation commands without flock, atomic operations, or final-path validation between them
-
Check filesystem permissions on cron directoriesRun: ls -la /etc/cron.d/ and ls -la /var/spool/cron/ to verify if low-privileged users have write access to parent directories where cron files are placedAffected if World-writable directories exist in the cron file deployment path allowing unprivileged users to manipulate files during the race window
-
Verify if cron jobs run as rootCheck crontab entries: crontab -l -u root or cat /etc/cron.d/nagios* to see which user executes the Nagios XI cron tasksAffected if Cron jobs execute as root and the installation script lacks proper synchronization between check and write operations
The environment is affected if Nagios XI version is 2011R1.8 or earlier AND crontab installation scripts contain non-atomic permission-check-then-file-operate sequences that allow filesystem manipulation by local users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to Nagios XI 2011R1.9 or later, which includes proper synchronization and final-path validation in crontab installation scripts.
Nagios XI 2011R1.9 or later
- Back up the existing Nagios XI installation and configuration files before proceeding with the upgrade
- Download Nagios XI version 2011R1.9 or later from the official Nagios website (www.nagios.com)
- Consult the official Nagios XI upgrade documentation for the specific upgrade procedure
- Execute the upgrade following the documented steps, ensuring the crontab installation scripts are updated
- After upgrade, verify the crontab entries are properly secured and owned by root
- Confirm the fix by checking that the vulnerable race condition in crontab installation scripts has been addressed in the new version
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2011-10035 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2011-10035 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data