CVE-2011-10040
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedNagios XI versions prior to 2011R1.9 are vulnerable to cross-site scripting (XSS) via the link-handling functions used by status and report pages. Insufficient validation or escaping of user-supplied input may allow an attacker to inject and execute arbitrary script in the context of a victim's browser.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceNagios XI versions prior to 2011R1.9 contain a reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the link-handling functions used by status and report pages. The application fails to properly validate or escape user-supplied input before rendering it in HTML output, allowing attackers to inject malicious JavaScript that executes in the context of authenticated users' browsers.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 2009= 2011CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Nagios XI installation and versionAccess the Nagios XI web interface and check the version information, typically found in the Help > About section, or run 'grep -i version /usr/local/nagiosxi/etc/system.inc' if you have command line accessAffected if The installed version is 2011 or earlier (versions <= 2009 or = 2011 are affected)
-
Confirm status page accessibilityNavigate to the Nagios XI status map or status page (typically at /nagiosxi/frontend/nagiosxi/includes/components/nagioscore/ui/views/ or similar status-related URLs)Affected if The status page is accessible without additional authentication beyond normal Nagios XI login
-
Confirm report page accessibilityNavigate to the Nagios XI report functionality (typically at /nagiosxi/frontend/nagiosxi/includes/components/reports/ or similar report-related URLs)Affected if The report page is accessible without additional authentication beyond normal Nagios XI login
-
Test link parameter handling for XSSInspect the URL parameters used in status and report pages (look for parameters in the URL query string that handle links or navigation), then attempt to identify if those parameters are reflected in the HTML output without encoding - you may use a browser developer tool or proxy to observe how user-supplied values in URL parameters are rendered back in the pageAffected if User-supplied input in URL parameters (especially link-related parameters) is reflected in the HTML output without proper encoding or validation
A user is affected if they are running Nagios XI version 2011 or earlier and have the status or report pages accessible to authenticated users, as the vulnerability exists in the link-handling functions of these pages.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade Nagios XI to version 2011R1.9 or later to obtain the vendor patch. If immediate upgrade is not feasible, implement input validation and output encoding on all status and report page link parameters as a compensating control.
Nagios XI 2011R1.9 or later
- 1. Backup your current Nagios XI installation and database before upgrading
- 2. Download Nagios XI version 2011R1.9 or later from the official Nagios website (www.nagios.com)
- 3. Run the Nagios XI upgrade installer following the official upgrade documentation
- 4. After upgrade, verify the installation is working correctly
- 5. Test that the status and report pages function properly with the new version
- 6. Confirm the XSS vulnerability is resolved by testing with legitimate input in link-handling functions
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,936.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2011-10040 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2011-10040 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data