Lotus NotesApplication · Ibm

CVE-2011-1216

HIGH · 9.3 CVSS v2.0 Published 2011-05-31
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 8.5.2.2 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Stack-based buffer overflow in assr.dll in Autonomy KeyView, as used in IBM Lotus Notes before 8.5.2 FP3, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted tag data in an Applix spreadsheet attachment, aka SPR PRAD8823A7.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Stack-based buffer overflow in assr.dll (Autonomy KeyView) allows remote code execution when IBM Lotus Notes processes a specially crafted Applix spreadsheet attachment containing malicious tag data. The vulnerability exists in versions prior to 8.5.2 FP3.

MitigationUpdate IBM Lotus Notes to version 8.5.2 FP3 or later to remediate the vulnerability. Until patched, avoid opening untrusted Applix spreadsheet attachments.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Lotus NotesApplication
Affected:<= 8.5.2.2= 3.0= 3.0.0.1= 3.0.0.2= 4.2= 4.2.1= 4.2.2= 4.5= 4.6= 4.6.7a= 4.6.7h= 5.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
M
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Complete
Integrity
Complete
Availability
Complete

AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed IBM Lotus Notes version
    Open IBM Lotus Notes, go to Help > About IBM Lotus Notes, or run 'nsd -version' from the Notes program directory to determine the exact version number
    Affected if The installed version is 8.5.2.2 or lower, or matches one of these: 3.0, 3.0.0.1, 3.0.0.2, 4.2, 4.2.1, 4.2.2, 4.5, 4.6, 4.6.7a, 4.6.7h, or 5.0
  2. Locate assr.dll in the Notes installation
    Search for assr.dll in the IBM Lotus Notes program directory, typically under the 'notes' or 'framework' subfolder
    Affected if The file assr.dll exists in the Notes installation directory, indicating the vulnerable Autonomy KeyView component is present
  3. Confirm Applix spreadsheet attachment handling is possible
    Verify that IBM Lotus Notes is configured to handle or preview attachments. Check if KeyView filter support for Applix files is present in the installation
    Affected if Notes can process or preview Applix spreadsheet attachments, which is the attack vector for this vulnerability

You are affected if IBM Lotus Notes version is 8.5.2.2 or lower, or matches any of the specific vulnerable versions (3.0 through 5.0), and the assr.dll component is present and capable of processing Applix spreadsheet attachments.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 8.5.2.2
Interim mitigation

Update IBM Lotus Notes to version 8.5.2 FP3 or later to remediate the vulnerability. Until patched, avoid opening untrusted Applix spreadsheet attachments.

Recommended fix High confidence

IBM Lotus Notes 8.5.2 FP3 (Fix Pack 3) or later

  1. Download IBM Lotus Notes 8.5.2 FP3 (Fix Pack 3) or later from the official IBM Fix Central website
  2. Verify the current installed version of Lotus Notes by checking About IBM Notes in the Help menu
  3. Close all running instances of Lotus Notes
  4. Install the downloaded fix pack (8.5.2 FP3 or later) following IBM's standard installation procedure
  5. Restart the Lotus Notes client after installation completes
  6. Confirm the version now shows 8.5.2.3 or higher to verify the patch was applied

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Lotus Notes Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation3.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
8.0 hours of engineering $1,420
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2011-1216 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2011-1216 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data