CVE-2011-1367
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUnspecified vulnerability in the File Load feature in IBM Rational AppScan Standard and Express 7.8.x, 7.9.x, and 8.0.x before 8.0.0.3 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a crafted .scan file.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIBM Rational AppScan (versions 7.8.x, 7.9.x, and 8.0.x before 8.0.0.3) contains an unspecified vulnerability in its File Load feature. Attackers can craft malicious .scan files that, when opened by a user, allow arbitrary command execution on the target system.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 7.8.0= 7.8.0.1= 7.8.0.2= 7.9.0= 7.9.0.1= 7.9.0.2= 7.9.0.3= 8.0.0= 8.0.0.1= 8.0.0.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- M
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify IBM Rational AppScan is installedCheck for the presence of IBM Rational AppScan in the program directory (commonly at C:\Program Files\IBM\Rational\AppScan or C:\Program Files (x86)\IBM\Rational\AppScan) or look for the application in the Windows Start Menu under IBM Rational AppScan.Affected if IBM Rational AppScan is present on the system.
-
Determine the installed version numberOpen IBM Rational AppScan and navigate to Help > About, or right-click the appscan.exe file, select Properties, and check the Version tab. Record the exact version number (for example, 8.0.0.2, 7.9.0.3, or 7.8.0.2).Affected if The installed version is 7.8.0, 7.8.0.1, 7.8.0.2, 7.9.0, 7.9.0.1, 7.9.0.2, 7.9.0.3, 8.0.0, 8.0.0.1, or 8.0.0.2.
-
Confirm access to the File Load featureIn the IBM Rational AppScan interface, locate the File menu or toolbar. Look for a 'File Load', 'Load Scan', or similar option that allows opening .scan files. This feature is present in all standard installations of the affected versions.Affected if The File Load or Open function for .scan files is accessible in the application.
-
Identify recently opened .scan filesCheck the application's recent files list (File > Recent Scans) or examine the file system for .scan files that may have been opened from untrusted sources. Inspect the Windows Temp folder or Downloads folder for any .scan files of unknown origin.Affected if Any .scan file from an untrusted source has been opened using the File Load feature.
A user is affected if IBM Rational AppScan versions 7.8.0 through 8.0.0.2 are installed and the File Load feature is used to open .scan files, allowing arbitrary command execution through maliciously crafted files.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade IBM Rational AppScan to version 8.0.0.3 or later. If upgrade is not possible, exercise extreme caution when opening .scan files from untrusted sources and consider disabling the File Load feature until patched.
Rational AppScan Standard/Express 8.0.0.3 or later
- 1. Verify current IBM Rational AppScan installation version via Help > About in the application
- 2. If version is 7.8.0, 7.8.0.1, 7.8.0.2, 7.9.0, or any 8.0.x version before 8.0.0.3, download Rational AppScan Standard or Express version 8.0.0.3 or later from IBM Fix Central (https://www-01.ibm.com/support/fixcentral/)
- 3. Ensure all .scan files are from trusted sources pending upgrade, as the vulnerability is exploited via malicious .scan files
- 4. Install the upgraded version following IBM's standard installation procedures
- 5. After upgrade, verify the File Load feature functions correctly with legitimate .scan files
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,200.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2011-1367 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2011-1367 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data