Lotus SametimeApplication · Ibm

CVE-2011-1370

MEDIUM · 5.0 CVSS v2.0 Published 2011-10-29
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
59/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The default configuration of the Sametime configuration servlet (SCS) in the server in IBM Lotus Sametime 7.0 through 8.5.2 does not enable an authentication requirement, which allows remote attackers to read the configuration settings by examining a response message.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The Sametime Configuration Servlet (SCS) in IBM Lotus Sametime versions 7.0 through 8.5.2 ships with a default configuration that does not require authentication, allowing unauthenticated remote attackers to retrieve sensitive configuration settings by examining server response messages.

MitigationEnable authentication requirement on the Sametime Configuration Servlet (SCS) in the server configuration to prevent unauthenticated access to configuration data.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Lotus SametimeApplication
Affected:= 7.0= 7.5= 7.5.0.1= 7.5.1= 7.5.1.1= 7.5.1.2= 8.0= 8.0.1= 8.0.2= 8.5= 8.5.1= 8.5.2

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
None
Availability
None

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm IBM Lotus Sametime installation and version
    Locate the Sametime installation directory and check the version. In a standard installation, look for a version file or check the installation logs. Use the system console or package manager if available to verify the installed version falls within 7.0 through 8.5.2.
    Affected if The installed version is any of: 7.0, 7.5, 7.5.0.1, 7.5.1, 7.5.1.1, 7.5.1.2, 8.0, 8.0.1, 8.0.2, 8.5, 8.5.1, or 8.5.2.
  2. Verify if Sametime Configuration Servlet (SCS) is exposed
    Identify whether the Sametime Configuration Servlet is deployed and accessible on the server. The endpoint is typically accessed via HTTP/HTTPS on the Sametime server. Check the server's web application configuration to confirm SCS is enabled.
    Affected if The SCS is deployed and reachable over the network.
  3. Test SCS endpoint without authentication credentials
    Send an HTTP request to the SCS endpoint without providing any authentication headers or credentials. Observe the server response. A vulnerable server will return configuration data or status information without requiring authentication.
    Affected if The SCS responds with configuration data, server settings, or diagnostic information without any authentication challenge.
  4. Inspect SCS authentication configuration
    Examine the Sametime server configuration files related to SCS. Look for settings that control authentication requirements on the configuration servlet. Check whether authentication is explicitly required or if the default (vulnerable) configuration is in place.
    Affected if The configuration shows authentication is not required for SCS, or the default configuration that shipped with the product is in use.

A user is affected if they run any IBM Lotus Sametime version 7.0-8.5.2 with the Sametime Configuration Servlet exposed and accessible without authentication, returning sensitive configuration data.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Enable authentication requirement on the Sametime Configuration Servlet (SCS) in the server configuration to prevent unauthenticated access to configuration data.

Fix this in Lotus Sametime Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
7.0 hours of engineering $1,240
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2011-1370 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2011-1370 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data