CVE-2011-1646
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe web management interface on the Cisco RVS4000 Gigabit Security Router with software 1.x before 1.3.3.4 and 2.x before 2.0.2.7, and the WRVS4400N Gigabit Security Router with software before 2.0.2.1, allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary commands via the (1) ping test parameter or (2) traceroute test parameter, aka Bug ID CSCtn23871.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceCommand injection vulnerability in the web management interface of Cisco RVS4000 and WRVS4400N Gigabit Security Routers allows authenticated users to execute arbitrary operating system commands via the ping and traceroute test parameters.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1= 2= 1.3.0.5= 1.3.1.0= 1.3.2.0= 2.0.0.3= 1.0= 1.1= 2= 1.3.0.5= 1.3.1.0= 1.3.2.0= 2.0.0.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- Single
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the router modelCheck the device label or web interface header for the exact model number (RVS4000 or WRVS4400N)Affected if The model is Cisco RVS4000 or WRVS4400N
-
Determine the firmware versionAccess the router web management interface and navigate to the Administration or Status section to view the firmware/software versionAffected if The firmware version is 1.3.0.5, 1.3.1.0, 1.3.2.0, or 2.0.0.3
-
Verify the web management interface is enabledCheck router settings for HTTP/HTTPS management access statusAffected if The web management interface is accessible (enabled)
-
Confirm ping or traceroute functionality is accessibleLocate the Diagnostic or Administration tools section in the web interface where ping and traceroute tests are providedAffected if The ping or traceroute test feature is available and accessible to authenticated users
You are affected if you have a Cisco RVS4000 or WRVS4400N router running firmware version 1.3.0.5, 1.3.1.0, 1.3.2.0, or 2.0.0.3 with the web management interface enabled and ping/traceroute functionality accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade router firmware to version 1.3.3.4 or later for RVS4000 1.x, 2.0.2.7 or later for RVS4000 2.x, or 2.0.2.1 or later for WRVS4400N. If patching is not feasible, restrict web management interface access to trusted administrative networks only.
RVS4000: upgrade to 1.3.3.4 (for 1.x) or 2.0.2.7 (for 2.x); WRVS4400N: upgrade to 2.0.2.1 or later
- 1. Identify the current installed firmware version on the Cisco RVS4000 or WRVS4400N router via the web management interface or console.
- 2. Access the Cisco software download page for RVS4000 or WRVS4400N routers using the product's official support page.
- 3. Download the appropriate fixed firmware version: For RVS4000 1.x, download version 1.3.3.4 or later; for RVS4000 2.x, download version 2.0.2.7 or later; for WRVS4400N, download version 2.0.2.1 or later.
- 4. Access the router's web management interface and navigate to the Administration > Firmware Upgrade section.
- 5. Upload and apply the fixed firmware version, ensuring stable power during the upgrade process.
- 6. After the router reboots, verify the new firmware version is installed and test that the ping and traceroute functions work correctly.
- 7. Consider changing administrator passwords after the upgrade as a precautionary measure, since this was an authenticated command injection vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2011-1646 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2011-1646 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data