CVE-2011-1803
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue exists in third_party/WebKit/Source/WebCore/svg/animation/SVGSMILElement.h in WebKit in Google Chrome before Blink M11 and M12 when trying to access a removed smil element.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceUse-after-free vulnerability in WebKit's SVG SMIL animation handling (SVGSMILElement.h) where attempting to access a previously removed SMIL element can lead to memory corruption and potentially arbitrary code execution. This is a memory safety issue in the animation element lifecycle management.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< m11CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the browser engineOpen chrome://version and check if the browser is Chrome, Chromium, or another Blink-based browser. Look for 'Blink' in the user agent string or version details.Affected if The browser is not Blink-based (e.g., uses WebKit, Gecko, or other engines)
-
Determine the Blink versionIn Chrome/Chromium, check chrome://version for the version number. Compare the Chromium/Chrome version to known version numbers corresponding to Blink M11. Chrome 11 and earlier correspond to Blink versions before M11.Affected if The installed Chrome/Chromium version is 11 or earlier (Blink versions before M11)
-
Verify SVG SMIL animation usageInspect web content being viewed or loaded. Look for <animate>, <animateTransform>, <set>, or other SMIL animation elements within SVG files. Check if any web pages visited contain SVG content with animated elements.Affected if SVG SMIL animations are actively being processed in the browser
The environment is affected if using a Blink-based browser (Chrome/Chromium version 11 or earlier) while processing content that contains SVG SMIL animations.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade Google Chrome to Blink M11 or later versions which contain the fix for this vulnerability. Alternatively, disable or avoid SVG SMIL animations in untrusted content.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,992.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2011-1803 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2011-1803 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data