CVE-2011-2064
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCisco IOS 12.4MDA before 12.4(24)MDA5 on the Cisco Content Services Gateway - Second Generation (CSG2) allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device reload) via crafted ICMP packets, aka Bug ID CSCtl79577.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a denial of service vulnerability in Cisco IOS 12.4MDA on the Cisco Content Services Gateway Second Generation (CSG2). Remote attackers can send specially crafted ICMP packets that cause the device to reload, resulting in service disruption. The vulnerability exists in versions prior to 12.4(24)MDA5.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 12.4\(24\)md1= 12.4\(24\)md2= 12.4\(24\)md3= 12.4\(24\)md4= 12.4\(24\)mda= 12.4mdaall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the device modelUse the 'show version' command or check the device hardware label to confirm it is a Cisco Content Services Gateway Second Generation (CSG2)Affected if The device is a Cisco CSG2
-
Check the IOS versionRun 'show version' and look for the IOS version string. It should show 12.4MDA family such as 12.4(24)md1, 12.4(24)md2, 12.4(24)md3, 12.4(24)md4, 12.4(24)mda, or 12.4mdaAffected if The IOS version is 12.4MDA and is prior to 12.4(24)MDA5
-
Confirm the IOS trainIn the 'show version' output, verify the software image name contains 'mda' in the train designationAffected if The IOS image includes the 'mda' train
-
Verify ICMP network exposureCheck network configuration and ACLs to determine if the CSG2 device can receive ICMP packets from untrusted external networksAffected if The device is reachable by untrusted ICMP traffic from outside the trusted network
You are affected if your device is a Cisco CSG2 running Cisco IOS 12.4MDA versions prior to 12.4(24)MDA5 and the device is exposed to untrusted ICMP traffic.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade Cisco IOS to version 12.4(24)MDA5 or later. As a workaround, filter or block untrusted ICMP traffic at network boundaries to prevent external attackers from reaching the affected device.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,488.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2011-2064 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2011-2064 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data