Proliant Sl Advanced Power ManagerHardware / appliance · Hp

CVE-2011-2405

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v2.0 Published 2011-08-11
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 1.11 or later.
See remediation →
87/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The HP ProLiant SL Advanced Power Manager (SL-APM) with firmware before 1.20 does not properly validate users, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via unspecified vectors.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

HP ProLiant SL Advanced Power Manager (SL-APM) firmware versions prior to 1.20 contain an improper user validation vulnerability that allows remote attackers to cause denial of service. The exact attack vector is unspecified in available documentation, but the vulnerability is exploitable remotely without authentication.

MitigationUpdate SL-APM firmware to version 1.20 or later. If immediate patching is not possible, restrict network access to the power management interface using network segmentation or firewall rules to limit exposure to untrusted networks.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Proliant Sl Advanced Power ManagerHardware / appliance
Affected:all versions
Proliant Sl Advanced Power Manager FirmwareApplication
Affected:<= 1.11= 1.10

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
Complete

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if HP ProLiant SL Advanced Power Manager is deployed
    Check your infrastructure inventory or physically locate the SL-APM module in HP ProLiant SL chassis. The SL-APM is a power management controller card installed in the chassis.
    Affected if The product is present in the environment - all versions of HP ProLiant SL Advanced Power Manager are affected by this vulnerability.
  2. Check SL-APM firmware version
    Access the SL-APM management interface (typically through the iLO or chassis management IP) and navigate to the firmware or version information section. Alternatively, use the HP SUM (Smart Update Manager) to scan the firmware version.
    Affected if Firmware version is 1.11 or lower, or specifically version 1.10. Versions prior to 1.20 are affected; version 1.20 and later are fixed.
  3. Verify remote access configuration
    Check the network configuration of the SL-APM management interface. Determine if the management port is directly accessible from network segments outside the trusted management network.
    Affected if The SL-APM management interface is exposed to untrusted network segments or the internet without firewall filtering.
  4. Review for authentication enforcement
    Examine the SL-APM web interface or CLI for authentication settings. Attempt to access the management URL without credentials to confirm whether authentication is enforced.
    Affected if The interface allows unauthenticated access or authentication can be bypassed, confirming the improper user validation flaw.

A user is affected if HP ProLiant SL Advanced Power Manager is present in their environment (all versions contain the flaw) and the management interface is network-accessible, with firmware versions prior to 1.20 confirming the specific vulnerable state.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 1.11
Interim mitigation

Update SL-APM firmware to version 1.20 or later. If immediate patching is not possible, restrict network access to the power management interface using network segmentation or firewall rules to limit exposure to untrusted networks.

Fix this in Proliant Sl Advanced Power Manager Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
18.0 hours of engineering $3,200
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2011-2405 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2011-2405 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data