CVE-2011-2547
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe web-based management interface on Cisco SA 500 series security appliances with software before 2.1.19 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary commands via crafted parameters to web forms, aka Bug ID CSCtq65681.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceCommand injection vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco SA 500 series security appliances allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary operating system commands via crafted parameters in web forms. Affected software versions are prior to 2.1.19.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 2.1.18= 1.0.14= 1.0.15= 1.0.17= 1.0.39= 1.1.21= 1.1.42= 1.1.65all versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- Single
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the device modelAccess the device's web management interface or CLI and check the model number displayed in the system information or status page. Look for model identifiers such as Cisco SA 500, SA520, SA520w, or SA540.Affected if The device is any of these models: Cisco SA 500, SA520, SA520w, or SA540.
-
Check the installed software versionIn the web interface, navigate to System > Status or System > Information to view the software version. Alternatively, use the CLI command 'show version' or 'system show version' to retrieve the firmware version.Affected if The installed version is prior to 2.1.19, or matches any of these: 1.0.14, 1.0.15, 1.0.17, 1.0.39, 1.1.21, 1.1.42, 1.1.65.
-
Verify web management interface is enabledCheck the device configuration for web-based management interface settings. In the web UI, go to System Administration > Remote Management or similar section. From CLI, use 'show http server status' or check firewall rules that permit HTTPS/HTTP access to the device.Affected if The web-based management interface (HTTP or HTTPS) is enabled and accessible from the network where the check is performed.
-
Confirm remote access is permittedReview the access control settings for the management interface. Check if the web interface is bound to WAN-facing interfaces or if access is restricted to LAN/trusted interfaces only. Inspect firewall or access list rules that control who can reach the management ports (typically 443/HTTPS or 80/HTTP).Affected if The management interface is reachable from untrusted networks or the WAN interface without VPN or ACL restrictions.
A user is affected if they have a Cisco SA 500, SA520, SA520w, or SA540 device running software version 2.1.18 or earlier, with the web-based management interface enabled and accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade Cisco SA 500 series appliances to software version 2.1.19 or later. If immediate upgrade is not feasible, restrict access to the management interface to trusted networks or use VPN access controls.
2.1.19 or later
- 1. Access the Cisco SA 500 web-based management interface by navigating to the device's IP address in a web browser
- 2. Log in with administrative credentials
- 3. Navigate to the System Administration or Maintenance section (exact location varies by firmware version)
- 4. Locate the Firmware/Software Upgrade option
- 5. Download the firmware version 2.1.19 or later from the Cisco software download center (requires valid Cisco service contract)
- 6. Upload the new firmware file to the appliance
- 7. Wait for the upload and installation process to complete - do not power off the device during this process
- 8. After reboot, log back into the management interface and verify the firmware version shows 2.1.19 or later
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,728.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2011-2547 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2011-2547 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data