CVE-2011-2882
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedStack-based buffer overflow in the NSEPA.NsepaCtrl.1 ActiveX control in nsepa.ocx in Citrix Access Gateway Enterprise Edition 8.1 before 8.1-67.7, 9.0 before 9.0-70.5, and 9.1 before 9.1-96.4 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted HTTP header data.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceStack-based buffer overflow in the NSEPA.NsepaCtrl.1 ActiveX control (nsepa.ocx) in Citrix Access Gateway Enterprise Edition allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted HTTP header data. The vulnerability affects versions 8.1 before 8.1-67.7, 9.0 before 9.0-70.5, and 9.1 before 9.1-96.4.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 8.1= 9.0= 9.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- M
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Citrix Access Gateway installationCheck system for presence of Citrix Access Gateway software by looking for installation directories, services, or the nsepa.ocx ActiveX control file on the system.Affected if Citrix Access Gateway Enterprise Edition is installed and the nsepa.ocx file is present on the system.
-
Determine installed versionQuery the installed Citrix Access Gateway version through installed programs list, product information, or version file if available. Compare the version number against the affected ranges: 8.1 before 8.1-67.7, 9.0 before 9.0-70.5, or 9.1 before 9.1-96.4.Affected if The installed version is 8.1, 9.0, or 9.1 and is lower than the patched versions (8.1-67.7, 9.0-70.5, or 9.1-96.4).
-
Locate the vulnerable ActiveX controlSearch for the nsepa.ocx file on the system, typically found in the Citrix Access Gateway installation directory or Windows system directories.Affected if The nsepa.ocx file exists on the system.
-
Check if NSEPA ActiveX control is registeredInspect Windows registry for the presence of the NSEPA.NsepaCtrl.1 CLSID registration under HKLM\SOFTWARE\Classes\ or verify the control is loadable by browsers or dependent applications.Affected if The NSEPA.NsepaCtrl.1 ActiveX control is registered and accessible.
The system is affected if Citrix Access Gateway Enterprise Edition versions 8.1, 9.0, or 9.1 are installed with the nsepa.ocx ActiveX control present and the version is below the patched releases (8.1-67.7, 9.0-70.5, or 9.1-96.4).
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the vendor patches (8.1-67.7, 9.0-70.5, or 9.1-96.4 or later) to the affected Citrix Access Gateway installations. If patching is not immediately feasible, disable the vulnerable ActiveX control or restrict access to the affected endpoints.
Access Gateway 8.1-67.7, 9.0-70.5, or 9.1-96.4 (depending on your baseline version)
- 1. Identify the currently installed Citrix Access Gateway version (8.1, 9.0, or 9.1)
- 2. Download the appropriate cumulative hotfix from Citrix support based on your current version
- 3. For Access Gateway 8.1: Apply hotfix 8.1-67.7 or later
- 4. For Access Gateway 9.0: Apply hotfix 9.0-70.5 or later
- 5. For Access Gateway 9.1: Apply hotfix 9.1-96.4 or later
- 6. Restart the Access Gateway services as required by the hotfix installation
- 7. Verify the installed version matches or exceeds the security fix level
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2011-2882 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2011-2882 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data