CVE-2011-2908
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the JMX Console (jmx-console) in JBoss Enterprise Portal Platform before 5.2.2, BRMS Platform 5.3.0 before roll up patch1, and SOA Platform 5.3.0 allows remote authenticated users to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that perform operations on MBeans and possibly execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceCSRF vulnerability in JBoss JMX Console allows authenticated attackers to hijack other users' sessions and perform operations on MBeans, potentially leading to arbitrary code execution. The vulnerability affects JBoss Enterprise Portal Platform, BRMS Platform, and SOA Platform versions prior to the specified patches.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 5.3.0<= 5.2.1= 5.0.0= 5.0.1= 5.1.0= 5.1.1= 5.2.0= 5.3.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- M
- Authentication
- Single
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
AV:N/AC:M/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify JBoss installation and versionLocate the JBoss installation directory and check version files (such as version.properties, manifest files, or startup logs). Common paths include $JBOSS_HOME/bin/run.jar or check the application server's welcome page.Affected if The installed version matches Red Hat JBoss Enterprise BRMS Platform 5.3.0, Portal Platform versions 5.0.0 through 5.2.1 (including 5.0.0, 5.0.1, 5.1.0, 5.1.1, 5.2.0), or SOA Platform 5.3.0.
-
Verify JMX Console is deployed and accessibleAttempt to access the JMX Console web interface by navigating to the /jmx-console/ path on the server (for example, http://hostname:port/jmx-console/). Check if the deployment exists in $JBOSS_HOME/server/<profile>/deploy/jmx-console.war/Affected if The JMX Console is deployed and accessible without authentication requirements or the console responds successfully to HTTP requests.
-
Inspect JMX Console configuration for CSRF protectionExamine the JMX Console deployment descriptor (web.xml) located in $JBOSS_HOME/server/<profile>/deploy/jmx-console.war/WEB-INF/web.xml. Look for any CSRF filter, token validation, or referer checking servlet filters configured.Affected if The web.xml lacks CSRF protection mechanisms such as a security filter, token validation, or referer header checks.
-
Check for custom CSRF countermeasures in applicationReview any custom filter or valve implementations in the JBoss server configuration (server.xml) or the JMX Console deployment descriptors that may implement CSRF token generation or session validation.Affected if No custom CSRF filters, valves, or token-based protections are found in the JMX Console or server configuration.
You are affected if you are running any of the specified JBoss Enterprise platform versions (BRMS 5.3.0, Portal Platform <= 5.2.1, or SOA Platform 5.3.0) with the JMX Console deployed and accessible, and the JMX Console lacks CSRF protection configuration.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor patches (Portal Platform 5.2.2+, BRMS/SOA roll up patch1+) and restrict or disable JMX Console access if not required. Implement CSRF tokens if continued use is necessary.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,168.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2011-2908 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2011-2908 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data