CVE-2011-3123
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIBM InfoSphere Information Server 8.5 and 8.5.0.1 on Unix and Linux, as used in IBM InfoSphere DataStage 8.5 and 8.5.0.1 and other products, uses weak permissions for unspecified files, which allows local users to gain privileges via unknown vectors.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceIBM InfoSphere Information Server and DataStage versions 8.5 and 8.5.0.1 on Unix/Linux systems contain files with weak permissions, allowing local unprivileged users to potentially modify or replace executable files and gain elevated privileges.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 8.5= 8.5.0.1= 8.5= 8.5.0.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify if IBM InfoSphere Information Server or DataStage is installedLocate the installation directory by checking common paths such as /opt/IBM/InformationServer or searching for dsjob, InfoSphere, or DataStage executables using 'find / -name "dsjob" -o -name "InfoSphere" 2>/dev/null'Affected if The product is found to be installed on Unix/Linux systems
-
Determine the installed version of InfoSphere or DataStageRun 'ls -la' on the installation directory and check version files, or run 'dsjob -version' if the dsjob command is available, or check for version files in the installation directory structureAffected if The version is 8.5 or 8.5.0.1 specifically
-
Identify the installation directory pathLocate the root directory containing the IBM InfoSphere installation, typically found under /opt/IBM/InformationServer or /opt/IBM/InfoSphereAffected if The installation directory exists and contains InfoSphere or DataStage components
-
Check file permissions on executable files in the installation directoryUse 'find <installation_dir> -type f -executable -ls' to list executables, then check permissions with 'ls -la <installation_dir>/bin/*' or similar to identify files with world-writable (w) or group-writable permissionsAffected if Executable files or scripts in the installation directory have permissions allowing write access by non-privileged users (such as 777, 775, or similar world-writable/group-writable modes)
-
Inspect critical directories for overly permissive accessCheck directories such as bin, lib, server, or scripts subdirectories within the InfoSphere installation using 'ls -ld <install_dir>/{bin,lib,server,scripts}' to see if they are world-writableAffected if Any directory containing executable code or configuration files has permissions like 777 or allows write access by non-admin users
A system is affected if IBM InfoSphere Information Server or DataStage version 8.5 or 8.5.0.1 is installed on Unix/Linux and the installation directory or its executables have world-writable or group-writable permissions that would allow a local unprivileged user to modify or replace executable files.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataIdentify and correct file permissions on IBM InfoSphere installation directories to restrict write access to authorized administrators, or apply vendor-supplied patches for version 8.5/8.5.0.1.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2011-3123 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2011-3123 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data