CVE-2011-3135
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUnspecified vulnerability in the Runtime in IBM Tivoli Federated Identity Manager (TFIM) 6.2.0 before 6.2.0.9 and Tivoli Federated Identity Manager Business Gateway (TFIMBG) 6.2.0 before 6.2.0.9 has unknown impact and attack vectors.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceUnspecified vulnerability in the Runtime component of IBM Tivoli Federated Identity Manager (TFIM) 6.2.0 through 6.2.0.8 and Tivoli Federated Identity Manager Business Gateway (TFIMBG) 6.2.0 through 6.2.0.8. The specific technical details, attack vectors, and impact are not documented in the CVE entry, but the CVSS score of 10 indicates critical severity with complete compromise potential.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 6.2.0= 6.2.0.1= 6.2.0.2= 6.2.0.3= 6.2.0.8= 6.2.0= 6.2.0.1= 6.2.0.2= 6.2.0.3= 6.2.0.8CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed TFIM or TFIMBG versionLocate the installation directory and check version files or use IBM installation verification utilities. Common locations include /opt/ibm/TFIM or C:\Program Files\IBM\TFIM. Look for version.info, about.html, or run 'TFIMVersion' command if available.Affected if The installed version matches 6.2.0, 6.2.0.1, 6.2.0.2, 6.2.0.3, or 6.2.0.8 for either TFIM or TFIMBG
-
Verify Runtime component is deployedCheck if the TFIM Runtime component is installed and running. Look for Runtime-related processes, services, or web applications in the deployment. Inspect the WebSphere or WAS configuration for TFIM Runtime EAR/WAR deployments.Affected if The Runtime component is installed and active in the TFIM or TFIMBG environment
-
Confirm exposed Runtime interfacesInspect the web application configuration for exposed Runtime endpoints. Check WebSphere administrative console or httpd.conf for mappings to /tfim/ or /sps/ paths. Review deployed web services that expose Federation Runtime services.Affected if Runtime HTTP endpoints are accessible from the network without additional authentication controls
-
Check for unauthenticated access to RuntimeReview the WebSphere security configuration and TFIM policy files for allowUnauthenticated settings or anonymous access permissions to Runtime components. Examine XML configuration files in the config/manager or config/runtime directories.Affected if Unauthenticated or anonymous access is permitted to any Runtime component or service endpoint
You are affected if you are running TFIM or TFIMBG version 6.2.0 through 6.2.0.8 with the Runtime component deployed and exposed on the network.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to IBM Tivoli Federated Identity Manager and TFIMBG version 6.2.0.9 or later. Given the critical severity and that this is a Runtime vulnerability in an identity management product, treat this as potentially allowing full authentication bypass or privilege escalation until the patch is applied.
IBM Tivoli Federated Identity Manager 6.2.0.9 or later
- 1. Backup the current TFIM/TFIMBG configuration and any customizations
- 2. Download IBM Tivoli Federated Identity Manager 6.2.0.9 or later from IBM Fix Central (www-01.ibm.com)
- 3. Stop all TFIM/TFIMBG services
- 4. Install version 6.2.0.9 following the IBM installation documentation
- 5. Restore the configuration from backup after installation
- 6. Start the TFIM/TFIMBG services
- 7. Verify the Runtime component is functioning correctly and validate the fix
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,808.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2011-3135 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2011-3135 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data