CVE-2011-3275
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMemory leak in Cisco IOS 12.4, 15.0, and 15.1, and IOS XE 2.5.x through 3.2.x, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via a crafted SIP message, aka Bug ID CSCti48504.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceMemory leak vulnerability in Cisco IOS 12.4/15.0/15.1 and IOS XE 2.5.x-3.2.x allows remote attackers to cause denial of service via crafted SIP (Session Initiation Protocol) messages, leading to uncontrolled memory consumption.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 12.4= 15.0= 15.1= 2.5.0= 2.5.1= 2.5.2= 2.6.0= 2.6.1= 2.6.2= 3.1.0s= 3.1.1s= 3.1.2s= 3.1.3s= 3.1.4s= 3.2.0sCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Cisco IOS or IOS XE versionExecute 'show version' on the device command line and locate the 'IOS' or 'IOS XE' version string in the outputAffected if The displayed version matches 12.4, 15.0, or 15.1 for IOS, or any of 2.5.0, 2.5.1, 2.5.2, 2.6.0, 2.6.1, 2.6.2, 3.1.0S, 3.1.1S, 3.1.2S, 3.1.3S, 3.1.4S, or 3.2.0S for IOS XE
-
Determine if SIP functionality is enabledExecute 'show running-config | include sip' or 'show voip sip' to check for SIP configuration on the deviceAffected if SIP-related configuration lines appear in the output, indicating SIP is configured on the device
-
Verify SIP transport listeners are activeExecute 'show sip-ua transport' or 'show sip server' to check if SIP listeners are actively bound to portsAffected if The output shows SIP transport listeners in LISTEN or ACTIVE state, confirming the device is accepting SIP traffic
The device is affected if it runs a vulnerable IOS or IOS XE version listed above AND has SIP functionality enabled and actively listening for SIP messages.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade affected Cisco IOS and IOS XE devices to patched versions that address this vulnerability. If immediate upgrade is not possible, consider SIP message filtering at network perimeter or disabling SIP functionality if not required.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,544.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2011-3275 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2011-3275 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data