CVE-2011-3282
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUnspecified vulnerability in Cisco IOS 12.2SRE before 12.2(33)SRE4, 15.0, and 15.1, and IOS XE 2.1.x through 3.3.x, when an MPLS domain is configured, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device reload) via an ICMPv6 packet, related to an expired MPLS TTL, aka Bug ID CSCtj30155.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA denial of service vulnerability exists in Cisco IOS 12.2SRE, 15.0/15.1 and IOS XE 2.1.x-3.3.x when an MPLS domain is configured. Remote attackers can send specially crafted ICMPv6 packets that trigger an expired MPLS TTL condition, causing the device to reload unexpectedly.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 12.2\(33\)sre= 12.2\(33\)sre0a= 12.2\(33\)sre1= 12.2\(33\)sre2= 12.2\(33\)sre3= 12.2sre= 15.0= 15.1= 2.1.0= 2.1.1= 2.1.2= 2.2.1= 2.2.2= 2.2.3= 2.3.0= 2.3.1= 2.3.2= 2.4.0= 2.4.1= 2.4.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Cisco IOS/IOS XE versionUse the command 'show version' on the device console or via SSH to retrieve the running software versionAffected if The version matches any of these: 12.2(33)SRE, 12.2(33)SRE0a, 12.2(33)SRE1, 12.2(33)SRE2, 12.2(33)SRE3, 12.2SRE, 15.0, 15.1 for IOS; or 2.1.0 through 2.4.2 for IOS XE
-
Verify MPLS is enabledUse 'show mpls interface' or 'show running-config | include mpls' to check if MPLS is configured on any interfaceAffected if MPLS is actively configured on one or more interfaces
-
Confirm IPv6 is operationalUse 'show ipv6 interface brief' to see if IPv6 is enabled on any interfaceAffected if IPv6 interfaces are up and processing traffic
-
Check for ICMPv6 traffic handlingUse 'show ipv6 traffic' or examine ACLs applied to interfaces to verify ICMPv6 packets are permittedAffected if ICMPv6 traffic is allowed and processed by the device
The device is affected if it runs an affected IOS/IOS XE version AND has MPLS configured AND has IPv6/ICMPv6 enabled, because the vulnerability requires all three conditions to be present for exploitation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply Cisco IOS updates (12.2(33)SRE4 or later for 12.2SRE branch; vendor patches for 15.x and IOS XE). As interim mitigation, consider filtering or rate-limiting ICMPv6 traffic at network borders if MPLS is not required.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2011-3282 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2011-3282 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data