SmfApplication · Simplemachines

CVE-2011-3615

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v2.0 Published 2011-10-24
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 1.1.14 or later.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in Simple Machines Forum (SMF) before 1.1.15 and 2.x before 2.0.1 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via vectors involving a (1) HTML entity or (2) display name. NOTE: some of these details are obtained from third party information.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in Simple Machines Forum (SMF) versions before 1.1.15 and 2.0.1 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via malicious HTML entities or display names. The vulnerabilities are exploitable without authentication and could allow complete database compromise.

MitigationUpgrade SMF to version 1.1.15 or 2.0.1 or later. If immediate patching is not possible, consider restricting access to the forum or implementing web application firewall rules to filter malicious input.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
SmfApplication
Affected:<= 1.1.14= 1.0= 1.0.1= 1.0.2= 1.0.3= 1.0.4= 1.0.5= 1.0.6= 1.0.7= 1.0.8= 1.0.9= 1.0.10

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
Partial
Availability
Partial

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify SMF version
    Check the version.php file in your SMF installation directory, or log into the admin control panel and view the forum version information under 'Support' or 'Maintenance' sections.
    Affected if The installed version is 1.1.14 or lower, or is version 2.0.0 or lower, or matches any of the 1.0.x versions listed in the affected range (1.0 through 1.0.10).
  2. Confirm SMF is accessible to unauthenticated users
    Attempt to access the forum login and registration pages from an external network without being logged in. Verify that the forum permits guest access to view posts and user profiles.
    Affected if The forum allows unauthenticated (guest) access to features that process user-supplied display names or profile information.
  3. Check if custom display names are allowed
    Review the SMF admin settings under 'Registration' or 'Member Settings' to determine if users can set custom display names or if the system uses usernames directly from user input.
    Affected if Users can register or edit their profile to set custom display names without sanitization, or if HTML entity encoding is not properly handled before database queries.
  4. Identify database user privileges
    Examine your database configuration and the database user account used by SMF. Check if the SMF database user has privileges beyond what is necessary for forum operation, such as DROP, GRANT, or file operation permissions.
    Affected if The SMF database user has elevated privileges (such as administrative or file permissions) that could allow an attacker who exploits the SQL injection to compromise the entire database.

Your environment is affected if SMF is running any version before 1.1.15 or 2.0.1, the forum is accessible to unauthenticated users, and users can submit custom display names or profile data that gets stored and processed without proper SQL sanitization.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 1.1.14
Interim mitigation

Upgrade SMF to version 1.1.15 or 2.0.1 or later. If immediate patching is not possible, consider restricting access to the forum or implementing web application firewall rules to filter malicious input.

Fix this in Smf Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation3.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
8.0 hours of engineering $1,420
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2011-3615 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2011-3615 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data