CVE-2011-3838
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMultiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in Wuzly 2.0 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the (1) u parameter to fp.php, (2) epage parameter to newpage.php, (3) epost parameter to newpost.php, and (4) username parameter to login.php in admin/; or the (5) username parameter to mobile/login.php.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceWuzly 2.0 contains multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in five different scripts (fp.php, newpage.php, newpost.php, admin/login.php, and mobile/login.php) where user-supplied parameters (u, epage, epost, username) are not properly sanitized before being used in database queries, allowing remote attackers to inject and execute arbitrary SQL commands.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 2.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Wuzly 2.0 installationLocate Wuzly installation directory and check for version identifier. Look for version files, headers, or changelog files that explicitly state version 2.0.Affected if Wuzly version 2.0 is installed on the server.
-
Identify affected script filesSearch the web root for the five vulnerable scripts: fp.php, newpage.php, newpost.php, admin/login.php, and mobile/login.php.Affected if Any of these five PHP files exist in the Wuzly installation.
-
Check application network exposureDetermine if the Wuzly application is accessible over HTTP/HTTPS from external networks or the internet.Affected if The affected scripts are reachable via web requests from untrusted networks.
-
Inspect parameter handling in fp.phpOpen fp.php in a text editor and locate the 'u' parameter usage. Examine whether this parameter is passed directly to database queries without sanitization functions such as mysqli_real_escape_string, parameterized queries, or input validation.Affected if The 'u' parameter is used in SQL queries without proper escaping or prepared statements.
-
Inspect parameter handling in newpage.php and newpost.phpOpen newpage.php and newpost.php. Locate the 'epage' and 'epost' parameters respectively. Examine how these parameters are incorporated into database queries.Affected if The 'epage' or 'epost' parameters are concatenated into SQL queries without sanitization.
-
Inspect parameter handling in login scriptsOpen admin/login.php and mobile/login.php. Locate the 'username' parameter usage and examine how it is handled before being used in database queries.Affected if The 'username' parameter is used in SQL queries without proper input sanitization or parameterized queries.
A system is affected if Wuzly version 2.0 is installed, the vulnerable scripts exist, and any of the parameters (u, epage, epost, username) are used in SQL queries without proper sanitization or prepared statements.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataRemediate by implementing parameterized queries (prepared statements) or proper input validation/sanitization for all user-supplied parameters in the affected files, particularly the u, epage, epost, and username parameters.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,664.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2011-3838 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2011-3838 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data