Intrusion Prevention SystemApplication · Cisco

CVE-2011-4022

MEDIUM · 5.0 CVSS v2.0 Published 2012-05-03
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
59/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The sensor in Cisco Intrusion Prevention System (IPS) 7.0 and 7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (file-handle exhaustion and mainApp hang) by making authentication attempts that exceed the configured limit, aka Bug ID CSCto51204.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

In Cisco IPS 7.0 and 7.1, the sensor component does not properly limit authentication attempts, allowing remote attackers to exhaust file handles by sending excessive authentication requests beyond configured limits, causing the mainApp process to hang and resulting in denial of service.

MitigationApply Cisco-provided patches for Bug ID CSCto51204 to address the authentication rate limiting deficiency, and review/adjust the configured authentication attempt limits if available.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Intrusion Prevention SystemApplication
Affected:= 7.0= 7.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
Partial

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Cisco IPS sensor software version
    Use the 'show version' or 'show module' command on the IPS sensor CLI to determine the installed sensor software version
    Affected if The displayed version is 7.0 or 7.1 exactly
  2. Verify authentication rate limiting configuration
    Access the IPS sensor CLI and locate the authentication settings or rate limiting configuration. Look for any configuration related to authentication attempt limits or login attempt thresholds.
    Affected if Authentication rate limiting is not explicitly configured, disabled, or set to allow unlimited attempts
  3. Check for file handle exhaustion indicators
    Use system diagnostic commands such as 'show processes' or 'show resources' to examine file descriptor/handle usage, or review system logs for file handle exhaustion warnings
    Affected if File handles are approaching exhaustion limits or abnormal consumption is observed
  4. Verify mainApp process stability
    Execute 'show process' or similar command to check the status of the mainApp process, and review recent logs for any process hang or restart events
    Affected if The mainApp process has hung, restarted unexpectedly, or shows instability

A defender is affected if their Cisco IPS sensor runs version 7.0 or 7.1 and authentication rate limiting is not properly enforced, leading to potential file handle exhaustion and mainApp process instability.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply Cisco-provided patches for Bug ID CSCto51204 to address the authentication rate limiting deficiency, and review/adjust the configured authentication attempt limits if available.

Fix this in Intrusion Prevention System Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
10.0 hours of engineering $1,750
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2011-4022 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2011-4022 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data