Codemeter RuntimeApplication · Wibu

CVE-2011-4057

MEDIUM · 5.0 CVSS v2.0 Published 2012-01-13
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 4.30d or later.
See remediation →
59/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Wibu-Systems AG CodeMeter Runtime 4.30c, 4.10b, and possibly other versions before 4.40 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CodeMeter.exe crash) via certain crafted packets to TCP port 22350.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Wibu-Systems CodeMeter Runtime versions before 4.40 contain a denial-of-service vulnerability where remote attackers can crash the CodeMeter.exe service by sending crafted packets to TCP port 22350. The vulnerability is network-exploitable with no authentication required.

MitigationUpgrade CodeMeter Runtime to version 4.40 or later. If immediate patching is not feasible, consider network segmentation or firewall rules to restrict access to TCP port 22350 from untrusted sources.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Codemeter RuntimeApplication
Affected:<= 4.30d= 4.10b= 4.20a= 4.30c

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
Partial

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify CodeMeter Runtime is installed
    Check for the presence of CodeMeter Runtime on the system. Look for installation directory (typically C:\Program Files\WIBU-SYSTEMS\CodeMeter or C:\Program Files (x86)\WIBU-SYSTEMS\CodeMeter on Windows), or check Programs and Features/Control Panel for Wibu-Systems CodeMeter entry.
    Affected if CodeMeter Runtime is installed on the system
  2. Determine installed CodeMeter Runtime version
    Open the CodeMeter Control Center (usually accessible via Start menu or system tray), or right-click on CodeMeter.exe in the installation directory and view Properties > Details for the version number. Alternatively, check the version displayed in the CodeMeter Control Center's About or Information section.
    Affected if The installed version is 4.30d or lower, or exactly 4.10b, 4.20a, or 4.30c (any version before 4.40)
  3. Confirm TCP port 22350 is listening
    Open Command Prompt and run: netstat -an | findstr "22350" or use PowerShell: Get-NetTCPConnection -LocalPort 22350. This checks if the CodeMeter service is accepting connections on the default port.
    Affected if Port 22350 is shown as LISTENING or ESTABLISHED, indicating the service is exposed on the network
  4. Verify CodeMeter.exe service is running
    Open Services (services.msc) and locate "CodeMeter Runtime Server" or "CodeMeter License Server", or run: sc query CodeMeter in Command Prompt. Also check if CodeMeter.exe appears in Task Manager's running processes.
    Affected if The CodeMeter.exe service is currently running

If CodeMeter Runtime version is below 4.40 (specifically 4.30d or lower, or exactly 4.10b, 4.20a, or 4.30c) AND the service is running with TCP port 22350 exposed on the network, the system is vulnerable to CVE-2011-4057.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 4.30d
Interim mitigation

Upgrade CodeMeter Runtime to version 4.40 or later. If immediate patching is not feasible, consider network segmentation or firewall rules to restrict access to TCP port 22350 from untrusted sources.

Fix this in Codemeter Runtime Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation1.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
6.0 hours of engineering $1,040
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,664.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2011-4057 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2011-4057 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data