CVE-2011-4293
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe theme implementation in Moodle 2.0.x before 2.0.4 and 2.1.x before 2.1.1 triggers duplicate caching of Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) and JavaScript content, which allows remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions and write to an operating-system temporary directory via unspecified vectors.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe theme caching implementation in Moodle 2.0.x before 2.0.4 and 2.1.x before 2.1.1 has a flaw that causes duplicate caching of CSS and JavaScript files. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to bypass access restrictions and write arbitrary content to the operating system's temporary directory, potentially leading to arbitrary file write or code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 2.0.0= 2.0.1= 2.0.2= 2.0.3= 2.1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:P
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Moodle versionAccess the admin interface and navigate to Site Administration > Server > Environment, or check the version.php file in the Moodle installation directory (usually in the root moodle directory). The version is typically displayed on the main admin page or can be found in the version constant within version.php.Affected if The installed version is 2.0.0, 2.0.1, 2.0.2, 2.0.3, or 2.1.0 - these are the affected versions listed in the CVE.
-
Verify theme caching is enabledIn the Moodle admin panel, go to Site Administration > Appearance > Themes > Theme settings. Look for caching-related options such as 'Cache themes' or 'Theme designer mode'. Alternatively, check the config.php file in the Moodle root directory for $CFG->themecache = 1 or similar caching flags.Affected if Theme caching is enabled (this is the default state in affected versions, and the vulnerability exists specifically within the theme caching implementation).
-
Check temp directory permissionsExamine the permissions on the operating system's temporary directory (commonly /tmp on Linux systems, or the directory specified by $CFG->dataroot or the system temp folder). Verify write permissions for the web server user.Affected if The web server process has write access to the temporary directory, which is required for the vulnerability to be exploited for arbitrary file write.
-
Inspect temp directory for unexpected theme cache filesList contents of the temporary directory used by Moodle (check $CFG->tempdir in config.php or look in /tmp for moodle_ prefixed files). Look for unusually named CSS or JavaScript files, files with unexpected extensions, or files written at unusual times.Affected if There are duplicate or unexpected theme cache files present, or files that do not match expected Moodle theme cache naming conventions.
-
Review web server access logsExamine web server access logs for unusual requests to theme-related endpoints, particularly repeated requests that might indicate cache manipulation attempts or patterns matching the duplicate caching behavior.Affected if There are patterns of repeated theme requests or evidence of cache manipulation attempts in the logs.
A user is affected if their Moodle installation version is 2.0.0 through 2.0.3 or 2.1.0, theme caching is enabled (the default state), and the web server has write access to temporary directories.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade Moodle to version 2.0.4, 2.1.1, or later to address the theme caching vulnerability. Additionally, restrict write access to temporary directories and monitor for unauthorized file creation.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2011-4293 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2011-4293 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data