Webmi2adsApplication · Atvise

CVE-2011-4880

MEDIUM · 5.0 CVSS v2.0 Published 2012-04-13
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 2.0.1 or later.
See remediation →
59/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Directory traversal vulnerability in the web server in Certec atvise webMI2ADS (aka webMI) before 2.0.2 allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via a crafted HTTP request.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Directory traversal vulnerability in the web server component of Certec atvise webMI2ADS (webMI) versions prior to 2.0.2 allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files on the host system by using crafted HTTP requests with '../' sequences to navigate outside the web root directory.

MitigationUpgrade atvise webMI to version 2.0.2 or later. If upgrading is not immediately possible, restrict network access to the web server and implement input validation to reject HTTP requests containing path traversal sequences.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Webmi2adsApplication
Affected:<= 2.0.1= 1.0= 2.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
None
Availability
None

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm atvise webMI is installed
    Locate the atvise webMI2ADS installation directory or check running services for the webMI web server process. On Windows, look in Program Files for Certec or atvise directories. On Linux, check /opt or standard application directories.
    Affected if The product is present on the system and the web server component is running.
  2. Determine the installed version
    Inspect version files in the webMI installation directory, typically found in a version.txt, about dialog, or the webMI server executable metadata. Alternatively, access the webMI web interface and look for version information in the login page or help/about section.
    Affected if The installed version is 2.0.1 or earlier, or specifically versions 1.0 or 2.0.
  3. Verify the web server is network accessible
    Attempt to reach the webMI HTTP interface from a network client using a browser or curl command to the default webMI port (usually port 80 or 8080). Check firewall rules and network configuration to confirm external or unauthorized access is possible.
    Affected if The web server is exposed on a network interface accessible to potential attackers.
  4. Check for path traversal vulnerability
    Send a crafted HTTP GET request to the web server with directory traversal sequences such as GET /../../windows/win.ini or GET /../../etc/passwd and observe if the server returns file contents from outside the web root directory.
    Affected if The server returns file contents from outside the web root in response to traversal sequences, confirming the vulnerability is present and exploitable.

The system is affected if atvise webMI2ADS is installed with version 2.0.1 or earlier (including 1.0 and 2.0) and the web server component is network-accessible, allowing path traversal requests to read arbitrary files.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 2.0.1
Interim mitigation

Upgrade atvise webMI to version 2.0.2 or later. If upgrading is not immediately possible, restrict network access to the web server and implement input validation to reject HTTP requests containing path traversal sequences.

Fix this in Webmi2ads Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
13.0 hours of engineering $2,280
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,648.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2011-4880 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2011-4880 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data