BataviApplication

CVE-2012-0069

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v2.0 Published 2012-01-24
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 1.2 or later.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
SQL injection vulnerability in ajax.php in Batavi before 1.2.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the boxToReload parameter.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

SQL injection vulnerability in Batavi e-commerce platform's ajax.php allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary SQL commands via the boxToReload parameter. This enables attackers to potentially read, modify, or delete database contents, including sensitive customer and administrative data.

MitigationUpgrade to Batavi 1.2.1 or later, which contains the patched code with proper input sanitization/parameterized queries for the boxToReload parameter.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
BataviApplication
Affected:<= 1.2= 1.0= 1.0.1= 1.0.2= 1.0.3= 1.0.4= 1.0.5= 1.0.6= 1.1.1= 1.1.2= 1.1.4

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
Partial
Availability
Partial

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Batavi installation version
    Locate the version file or header in the Batavi installation directory. Common locations include a VERSION file, included version info in main index.php, or in a configuration file. Check the software documentation or source for version markers.
    Affected if The installed version matches one of the affected versions: 1.0, 1.0.1, 1.0.2, 1.0.3, 1.0.4, 1.0.5, 1.0.6, 1.1.1, 1.1.2, 1.1.4, or any version <= 1.2.
  2. Locate ajax.php in the web root
    Search for the file ajax.php in the Batavi web directory structure. This file typically handles AJAX requests within the application.
    Affected if The file ajax.php exists in the Batavi installation and is web-accessible.
  3. Inspect ajax.php for boxToReload parameter handling
    Open ajax.php and search for code handling the 'boxToReload' parameter. Look for SQL queries that directly incorporate this parameter without using parameterized queries or proper input sanitization.
    Affected if The code processes the boxToReload parameter in SQL queries without prepared statements, binding, or sanitization functions.
  4. Verify the vulnerable code pattern
    Examine the SQL query construction involving boxToReload. Check if the parameter value is concatenated directly into the SQL string rather than being passed as a bound parameter.
    Affected if The boxToReload value is inserted directly into SQL without escaping, quoting, or use of placeholder/binding mechanisms.
  5. Confirm web exposure of the vulnerable endpoint
    Test accessing ajax.php via HTTP and verify the boxToReload parameter can be submitted. Attempt a simple test payload to confirm the parameter is processed.
    Affected if The ajax.php script accepts and processes the boxToReload parameter from HTTP requests without validation.

A user is affected if they are running any Batavi version 1.0 through 1.2 (including all listed 1.0.x and 1.1.x variants) and the ajax.php file with the vulnerable boxToReload parameter handling is present and accessible on their web server.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 1.2
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to Batavi 1.2.1 or later, which contains the patched code with proper input sanitization/parameterized queries for the boxToReload parameter.

Fix this in Batavi Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,860
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2012-0069 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2012-0069 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data