CVE-2012-0159
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMicrosoft Windows XP SP2 and SP3, Windows Server 2003 SP2, Windows Vista SP2, Windows Server 2008 SP2, R2, and R2 SP1, Windows 7 Gold and SP1, and Windows 8 Consumer Preview; Office 2003 SP3, 2007 SP2 and SP3, and 2010 Gold and SP1; Silverlight 4 before 4.1.10329; and Silverlight 5 before 5.1.10411 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted TrueType font (TTF) file, aka "TrueType Font Parsing Vulnerability."
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA TrueType font (TTF) parsing vulnerability exists in multiple Windows versions, Office products, and Silverlight. Attackers can craft malicious TTF files that, when processed by vulnerable systems, allow arbitrary code execution. The vulnerability stems from improper handling of TTF font table data during parsing.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 2003= 2007= 2010all versions= consumer_previewall versions= r2all versionsall versions= 4.0.50401.0= 4.0.50524.00= 4.0.50826.0= 4.0.50917.0= 4.0.51204.0= 4.0.60129.0= 4.0.60310.0= 4.0.60531.0= 4.0.60831.0= 4.1.10111.0= 5.0.60401.0= 5.0.60818.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- M
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed Microsoft Office versionOpen any Office application (e.g., Word), go to File > Account > About [App] to see the version number (e.g., 14.0.x for Office 2010, 12.0.x for Office 2007, 11.0.x for Office 2003)Affected if Version matches 2003, 2007, or 2010 (any build)
-
Check Windows operating system versionRun 'winver' from Start menu search, or run 'systeminfo' in command prompt and check the OS Name and Version fieldsAffected if Windows XP, Vista, 7, Server 2008, Server 2008 R2, or Windows 8 consumer_preview is installed
-
Check Microsoft Silverlight versionOpen Control Panel > Programs and Features, find Microsoft Silverlight in the list and check the Version column, or visit the Silverlight version test page at http://silverlight.net/versionAffected if Version matches any of: 4.0.50401.0, 4.0.50524.00, 4.0.50826.0, 4.0.50917.0, 4.0.51204.0, 4.0.60129.0, 4.0.60310.0, 4.0.60531.0, 4.0.60831.0, 4.1.10111.0, 5.0.60401.0, or 5.0.60818.0
-
Verify if security update MS12-027 is installedOpen Control Panel > Programs and Features > View installed updates, search for 'MS12-027' or '2507224' in the search box; alternatively, run 'wmic qfe list' in command prompt and look for KB2507224 or related KBs in the outputAffected if No MS12-027 or associated security update is listed as installed
The system is affected if any of Office 2003/2007/2010, Windows XP/Vista/7/8/Server 2008(R2), or the listed Silverlight versions are installed AND MS12-027 security update is not applied.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply Microsoft security patches (MS12-027 and associated updates) to all affected systems. For systems that cannot be patched immediately, consider disabling TTF font file handling or using application whitelisting to prevent untrusted font loading.
Windows: Apply MS12-025 patch per Microsoft KB article | Silverlight: Upgrade to Silverlight 4.1.10329+ or Silverlight 5.1.10411+
- Apply Microsoft Security Bulletin MS12-025 patch for your specific Windows version (KB2658846 for most Windows versions, KB2659262 for Windows Server 2008)
- For Silverlight 4: Upgrade to version 4.1.10329 or later
- For Silverlight 5: Upgrade to version 5.1.10411 or later
- Ensure Windows Update is enabled and install all subsequent cumulative security updates
- Verify the patch was successfully installed by checking Windows Update history
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2012-0159 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2012-0159 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data