Intelligent Platforms Proficy Real Time Information PortalApplication · Ge

CVE-2012-0232

MEDIUM · 6.4 CVSS v2.0 Published 2012-03-15
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
73/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Directory traversal vulnerability in rifsrvd.exe in the Remote Interface Service in GE Intelligent Platforms Proficy Real-Time Information Portal 2.6, 3.0, 3.0 SP1, and 3.5 allows remote attackers to modify the configuration via crafted strings.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Directory traversal vulnerability in rifsrvd.exe (Remote Interface Service) allows remote attackers to manipulate file paths via crafted strings, enabling unauthorized modification of configuration files in GE Proficy Real-Time Information Portal versions 2.6, 3.0, 3.0 SP1, and 3.5.

MitigationApply vendor patches if available; if no patch exists, consider network segmentation to limit exposure of the Remote Interface Service and implement input validation/sanitization on file path parameters.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Intelligent Platforms Proficy Real Time Information PortalApplication
Affected:= 2.6= 3.0= 3.5

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Partial
Availability
Partial

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if Remote Interface Service is installed
    Check for the presence of rifsrvd.exe in the Proficy installation directory (typically C:\Program Files\GE Intelligent Platforms\Proficy Real-Time Information Portal\ or similar). Also check running processes for rifsrvd.exe.
    Affected if rifsrvd.exe is present and running on the system
  2. Determine Proficy Real-Time Information Portal version
    Open Windows Registry under HKLM\SOFTWARE\GEFanuc\Proficy\Real-Time Information Portal or check the program's About/Version info in the application menu. Compare against affected versions: 2.6, 3.0, 3.0 SP1, 3.5.
    Affected if Installed version matches exactly 2.6, 3.0, 3.0 SP1, or 3.5
  3. Verify Remote Interface Service is exposed to network
    Check listening ports using 'netstat -an | findstr LISTENING' or review firewall rules. The Remote Interface Service typically listens on port 8433 or 8080. Determine if the service port is accessible from network segments outside the local host.
    Affected if The rifsrvd.exe service port is open and accessible from untrusted network segments
  4. Inspect service configuration for unusual paths
    Examine configuration files in the Proficy installation directory, particularly those in the config or settings subdirectories. Look for any recent modifications or unexpected path entries that may indicate exploitation attempts.
    Affected if Configuration files show unexpected path entries or have been modified in ways inconsistent with normal administration

A system is affected if it runs the Remote Interface Service (rifsrvd.exe) from GE Proficy Real-Time Information Portal versions 2.6, 3.0, 3.0 SP1, or 3.5, and the service is network-accessible.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply vendor patches if available; if no patch exists, consider network segmentation to limit exposure of the Remote Interface Service and implement input validation/sanitization on file path parameters.

Fix this in Intelligent Platforms Proficy Real Time Information Portal Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation6.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
30.0 hours of engineering $5,280
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,448.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2012-0232 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2012-0232 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data