Ghost Solutions SuiteApplication · Symantec

CVE-2012-0306

MEDIUM · 6.8 CVSS v2.0 Published 2012-10-18
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
77/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Symantec Ghost Solution Suite 2.x through 2.5.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (memory corruption) via a crafted backup file.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Symantec Ghost Solution Suite versions 2.x through 2.5.1 contains a memory corruption vulnerability in its backup file parsing functionality. Attackers can exploit this by crafting malicious backup files, potentially achieving remote code execution or causing denial of service. The vulnerability stems from improper handling of malformed backup file structures.

MitigationApply available vendor patches for Symantec Ghost Solution Suite. If patches are unavailable for this legacy product, restrict access to the Ghost infrastructure, validate all backup files before processing, and consider migrating to a supported solution.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Ghost Solutions SuiteApplication
Affected:= 2.0= 2.0.0= 2.0.1= 2.5

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
M
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
Partial
Availability
Partial

AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm Ghost Solution Suite installation
    Check for Ghost installation by searching for executable files named 'ghost.exe' or 'gdisk.exe' in common installation paths such as C:\Program Files\Symantec\Ghost, or check Windows Registry under HKLM\SOFTWARE\Symantec\Ghost for installation keys.
    Affected if Symantec Ghost Solution Suite is found installed on the system.
  2. Identify installed version
    Locate the Ghost executable (commonly at C:\Program Files\Symantec\Ghost\ghost.exe) and check its file properties for version information, or query the Windows Registry key HKLM\SOFTWARE\Symantec\Ghost\Common\InstallDir for the installation path, then read version details from the executable.
    Affected if The installed version falls within 2.0 through 2.5.1.
  3. Verify backup parsing functionality is in use
    Review system tasks, scheduled tasks, or scripts that invoke Ghost for backup or imaging operations. Check for .gho or .v2i backup file extensions being processed, or examine any configuration files that define backup jobs.
    Affected if The system uses Ghost to process backup or imaging files.
  4. Inspect backup file locations for anomalies
    Examine directories where Ghost stores or processes backup files (typically .gho, .v2i, or related backup image files) for unexpectedly large files, files with unusual headers, or files lacking proper file structure.
    Affected if Malformed or suspicious backup files are present in directories accessed by Ghost.

A user is affected if Symantec Ghost Solution Suite versions 2.0 through 2.5.1 is installed and the backup file parsing functionality is actively used to process backup images.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply available vendor patches for Symantec Ghost Solution Suite. If patches are unavailable for this legacy product, restrict access to the Ghost infrastructure, validate all backup files before processing, and consider migrating to a supported solution.

Fix this in Ghost Solutions Suite Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
14.0 hours of engineering $2,380
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,808.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2012-0306 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2012-0306 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data