CVE-2012-0371
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCisco Wireless LAN Controller (WLC) devices with software 4.x, 5.x, 6.0, and 7.0 before 7.0.220.4, when CPU-based ACLs are enabled, allow remote attackers to read or modify the configuration via unspecified vectors, aka Bug ID CSCtu56709.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA vulnerability in Cisco Wireless LAN Controller firmware versions 4.x, 5.x, 6.0, and 7.0 before 7.0.220.4 allows remote attackers to read or modify device configuration when CPU-based ACLs are enabled. The unspecified attack vector combined with CVSS 9.3 indicates trivial network exploitation without authentication, granting full configuration access.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 4.0= 4.0.108= 4.0.155.0= 4.0.155.5= 4.0.179.8= 4.0.179.11= 4.0.196= 4.0.206.0= 4.0.217.0= 4.0.219.0= 4.1= 4.1.171.0all versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- M
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Cisco WLC modelUse the 'show inventory' command or check the physical device label to confirm the model number.Affected if The model is a Cisco 2000, 2100, 2106, 2112, 2125, 2500, or 2504 Wireless LAN Controller.
-
Check the firmware versionExecute 'show version' on the WLC CLI to retrieve the installed software version.Affected if The version is 4.x, 5.x, 6.0, or any 7.0.x version before 7.0.220.4.
-
Verify CPU-based ACLs are enabledRun 'show acl summary' or 'show run-config | include acl' to check whether CPU-based Access Control Lists are configured on the controller.Affected if CPU-based ACLs are enabled or configured on the device.
The environment is affected if the WLC model is among the vulnerable models listed, the firmware version falls within 4.x, 5.x, 6.0, or 7.0 before 7.0.220.4, and CPU-based ACLs are enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade Cisco WLC to version 7.0.220.4 or later; alternatively, if upgrade is not immediately feasible, evaluate disabling CPU-based ACLs as a temporary mitigation while planning the upgrade.
7.0.220.4 or later (or the latest 7.x release compatible with your hardware)
- 1. Identify the current Cisco WLC model and software version using 'show version' command
- 2. Download the fixed software version 7.0.220.4 or later from Cisco's software download center
- 3. Back up the current WLC configuration using 'save config' command
- 4. Upload the new software image to the WLC via TFTP, FTP, or the web interface
- 5. Reboot the controller to load the new software image
- 6. After reboot, verify the new version using 'show version'
- 7. Restore the configuration if needed and verify CPU-based ACL functionality
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2012-0371 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2012-0371 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data