CVE-2012-0384
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCisco IOS 12.2 through 12.4 and 15.0 through 15.2 and IOS XE 2.1.x through 2.6.x and 3.1.xS before 3.1.2S, 3.2.xS through 3.4.xS before 3.4.2S, 3.5.xS before 3.5.1S, and 3.1.xSG and 3.2.xSG before 3.2.2SG, when AAA authorization is enabled, allow remote authenticated users to bypass intended access restrictions and execute commands via a (1) HTTP or (2) HTTPS session, aka Bug ID CSCtr91106.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is an authentication bypass vulnerability in Cisco IOS and IOS XE where AAA (Authentication, Authorization, and Accounting) authorization is enabled. Remote authenticated users can bypass intended access restrictions and execute privileged commands via HTTP or HTTPS sessions. The vulnerability stems from improper handling of authorization checks when HTTP/HTTPS is used as the management interface.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 12.2= 12.2\(1\)= 12.2\(1\)dx= 12.2\(1\)s= 12.2\(1\)t= 12.2\(1\)xa= 12.2\(1\)xd= 12.2\(1\)xd1= 12.2\(1\)xd3= 12.2\(1\)xd4= 12.2\(1\)xe= 12.2\(1\)xe2= 2.1= 2.1.0= 2.1.1= 2.1.2= 2.2= 2.2.1= 2.2.2= 2.2.3= 2.3= 2.3.0= 2.3.1= 2.3.1tCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the IOS or IOS XE versionExecute 'show version' on the device CLI and note the firmware version string (for example, 12.2(1) or 2.1)Affected if The displayed version matches one of the affected versions: 12.2, 12.2(1), 12.2(1)dx, 12.2(1)s, 12.2(1)t, 12.2(1)xa, 12.2(1)xd, 12.2(1)xd1, 12.2(1)xd3, 12.2(1)xd4, 12.2(1)xe, 12.2(1)xe2 for IOS; or 2.1, 2.1.0, 2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.2, 2.2.1, 2.2.2, 2.2.3, 2.3, 2.3.0, 2.3.1, 2.3.1t for IOS XE
-
Verify AAA authorization is enabledRun 'show running-config | include aaa authorization' or 'show aaa authorization' to check if AAA authorization is configuredAffected if Output shows any AAA authorization method configured (such as 'aaa authorization exec default group' or similar)
-
Confirm HTTP or HTTPS server is activeRun 'show running-config | include ip http' or 'show ip http server status' to check if the HTTP/HTTPS server is enabledAffected if Output indicates 'ip http server' or 'ip http secure-server' is present in the configuration
Device is affected if it runs an affected IOS/IOS XE version AND has AAA authorization enabled AND has HTTP/HTTPS server configured, allowing remote authenticated users to bypass authorization via web management.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply Cisco security updates for the affected IOS/IOS XE versions. Alternatively, disable the HTTP/HTTPS server on affected devices when AAA authorization is enabled, or restrict access via ACLs on the VTY lines.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2012-0384 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2012-0384 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data