AutostartApplication · Emc

CVE-2012-0409

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v2.0 Published 2012-06-01
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Multiple buffer overflows in EMC AutoStart 5.3.x and 5.4.x before 5.4.3 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (agent crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via crafted packets.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Multiple buffer overflow vulnerabilities exist in EMC AutoStart versions 5.3.x and 5.4.x before 5.4.3. The flaws are triggered by specially crafted network packets sent to affected agents, leading to memory corruption that can cause denial of service (agent crash) or potentially allow arbitrary code execution by remote attackers.

MitigationUpgrade EMC AutoStart to version 5.4.3 or later to obtain the vendor patch. If immediate upgrade is not feasible, implement network segmentation and firewall rules to restrict unauthorized access to AutoStart ports/services.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
AutostartApplication
Affected:= 5.3= 5.4= 5.4.1= 5.4.2

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
Partial
Availability
Partial

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify EMC AutoStart is installed
    Check for EMC AutoStart software on the system. Look for the installation directory (commonly under C:\Program Files\EMC\AutoStart or similar) or check Add/Remove Programs for an entry named 'EMC AutoStart' or 'AutoStart'.
    Affected if EMC AutoStart is not found on the system, the system is not affected by this vulnerability.
  2. Determine the installed version
    Locate the EMC AutoStart installation and check for version information. Typical locations include a 'version.txt', 'readme.txt', or the executable properties (right-click the main executable and view Version info). Also check the Windows registry under HKLM\SOFTWARE\EMC\AutoStart or similar registry keys.
    Affected if The installed version is 5.3.x or 5.4.x (including 5.4.1 or 5.4.2). Versions 5.4.3 and later are NOT affected.
  3. Confirm the AutoStart agent service is running
    Open Windows Services (services.msc) and look for a service named 'AutoStart Agent' or 'EMC AutoStart' or check the task manager for processes related to AutoStart (such as hpsm or similar agent processes).
    Affected if The AutoStart agent service is not installed or not running, exploitation is not possible.
  4. Assess network exposure of AutoStart ports
    Check which network ports the AutoStart agent is listening on. Use 'netstat -an' or a port scanner to identify ports typically used by EMC AutoStart (commonly ports 2186, 2187, or 7900-7905). Determine if these ports are accessible from untrusted networks.
    Affected if The AutoStart agent is listening on accessible network ports and the version is 5.3.x or 5.4.x through 5.4.2, the system is vulnerable to remote exploitation.

A system is affected if EMC AutoStart version 5.3.x or 5.4.x through 5.4.2 is installed with the agent service running and exposed to network access.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade EMC AutoStart to version 5.4.3 or later to obtain the vendor patch. If immediate upgrade is not feasible, implement network segmentation and firewall rules to restrict unauthorized access to AutoStart ports/services.

Fix this in Autostart Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
15.0 hours of engineering $2,560
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,096.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2012-0409 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2012-0409 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data