CVE-2012-0459
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) implementation in Mozilla Firefox 4.x through 10.0, Firefox ESR 10.x before 10.0.3, Thunderbird 5.0 through 10.0, Thunderbird ESR 10.x before 10.0.3, and SeaMonkey before 2.8 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via dynamic modification of a keyframe followed by access to the cssText of the keyframe.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceMemory corruption vulnerability in Mozilla's CSS implementation where dynamic modification of a keyframe followed by access to its cssText property causes either application crash (DoS) or potential arbitrary code execution. The vulnerability stems from improper handling of keyframe manipulation in the CSS rendering engine.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 4.0= 4.0.1= 5.0= 5.0.1= 6.0= 6.0.1= 6.0.2= 7.0= 7.0.1= 8.0= 8.0.1= 9.0= 10.1= 10.2= 5.0= 6.0= 6.0.1= 6.0.2= 7.0= 7.0.1= 8.0= 9.0= 9.0.1= 10.0= 10.0.1= 10.0.2<= 2.7= 1.0= 1.0.1= 1.0.2= 1.0.3= 1.0.4= 1.0.5= 1.0.6= 1.0.7= 1.0.8= 1.0.9= 1.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Mozilla product and versionFor Firefox: go to Help > About Firefox. For Thunderbird: go to Help > About Thunderbird. For SeaMonkey: go to Help > About SeaMonkey. Note the exact version number displayed.Affected if The version matches any of the following: Firefox 4.0-9.0.1, Firefox ESR 10.1-10.2, Thunderbird 5.0-9.0.1, Thunderbird ESR 10.0-10.0.2, SeaMonkey 1.0-1.9 or SeaMonkey 2.0-2.7
-
Confirm product type and platformIdentify whether the affected installation is Firefox, Thunderbird, or SeaMonkey, and note whether it is the ESR (Extended Support Release) branch or standard release.Affected if The product is any of Firefox, Thunderbird, or SeaMonkey and falls within the affected version ranges listed in the CVE
-
Verify CSS keyframe functionality is accessibleThis vulnerability is triggered through web content manipulating CSS keyframes via JavaScript (e.g., modifying a keyframe rule and accessing its cssText property). Confirm the browser has JavaScript enabled and can render web content.Affected if JavaScript is enabled and the application can process CSS keyframe rules, which is the default configuration for all affected versions
A user is affected if they are running any of the listed Firefox, Thunderbird, or SeaMonkey versions (4.0-9.0.x for Firefox, 5.0-9.0.x for Thunderbird, 1.x or 2.x up to 2.7 for SeaMonkey, or ESR 10.x versions 10.0-10.2) and use the application to render web content with JavaScript enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor-supplied updates: Firefox ESR 10.x to 10.0.3 or later, Thunderbird ESR 10.x to 10.0.3 or later, SeaMonkey to 2.8 or later. Until patched, restrict access to untrusted web content where possible.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,696.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2012-0459 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- www.mozilla.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- rhn.redhat.com
- rhn.redhat.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- www.mandriva.com
- www.securitytracker.com
- www.securitytracker.com
- www.securitytracker.com
- www.ubuntu.com
- www.ubuntu.com
- www.ubuntu.com
- www.ubuntu.com
- www.ubuntu.com
- bugzilla.mozilla.org
- oval.cisecurity.org
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2012-0459 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data