CVE-2012-0507
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUnspecified vulnerability in the Java Runtime Environment (JRE) component in Oracle Java SE 7 Update 2 and earlier, 6 Update 30 and earlier, and 5.0 Update 33 and earlier allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors related to Concurrency. NOTE: the previous information was obtained from the February 2012 Oracle CPU. Oracle has not commented on claims from a downstream vendor and third party researchers that this issue occurs because the AtomicReferenceArray class implementation does not ensure that the array is of the Object[] type, which allows attackers to cause a denial of service (JVM crash) or bypass Java sandbox restrictions. NOTE: this issue was originally mapped to CVE-2011-3571, but that identifier was already assigned to a different issue.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe vulnerability exists in the AtomicReferenceArray class implementation within Java's concurrency utilities. The class fails to properly validate that the array is of Object[] type, allowing attackers to bypass Java sandbox restrictions or cause denial of service via JVM crashes. This enables remote code execution by circumventing Java's security model.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 6.0= 7.0= 1.5.0= 1.6.0= 1.6.0= 1.7.0= 10= 10= 11= 10= 11= 11CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed JRE/JDK versionRun 'java -version' or 'java -fullversion' from command line to see the installed Java runtime versionAffected if The version displayed is 1.7.0 (any update prior to 7u3), 1.6.0 (any update prior to 6u31), or 1.5.0 (any update prior to 5.0u34)
-
Check Java vendor and build detailsRun 'java -version -verbose' or check the full version string which includes update number (for example: 1.6.0_30)Affected if The update number is 30 or lower for Java 6, 33 or lower for Java 5, or 2 or lower for Java 7
-
Verify Java plugin browser configurationCheck if Java plugin is enabled in browsers (Internet Explorer, Firefox, Chrome) as the vulnerability can be exploited via malicious applets loaded in browsersAffected if Java browser plugin is installed and enabled, and the underlying JRE is a vulnerable version
You are affected if the installed Java version is 1.7.0 update 2 or earlier, 1.6.0 update 30 or earlier, or 1.5.0 update 33 or earlier, and you run untrusted Java code or applets.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply Java security updates released after the February 2012 Oracle Critical Patch Update. Upgrade to Java 7 Update 3 or later, Java 6 Update 31 or later, or Java 5.0 Update 34 or later.
Java SE 7 Update 3 or later, Java SE 6 Update 31 or later, or Java SE 5 Update 34 or later (or OpenJDK equivalents)
- 1. Identify the currently installed Java version by running 'java -version' or 'javac -version'
- 2. For Oracle Java SE: Download and install Java SE 7 Update 3 or later, Java SE 6 Update 31 or later, or Java SE 5 Update 34 or later from Oracle's official Java SE Downloads page (http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/downloads/)
- 3. For Debian Linux systems: Run 'apt-get update && apt-get upgrade' to apply security updates, or specifically install openjdk-7-jdk (or later) via 'apt-get install openjdk-7-jdk'
- 4. For SUSE Linux Enterprise systems: Run 'zypper patch' or 'zypper update java-*' to apply available security patches
- 5. After installation, verify the fix by running 'java -version' and confirming the version is at least 1.5.0_34, 1.6.0_31, 1.7.0_03, or later
- 6. If using Java in browsers (Java Plug-in), ensure browsers are restarted and consider disabling the Java Plug-in until patches are applied if running vulnerable versions
- 7. Re-scan or re-assess systems to confirm remediation
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2012-0507 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- weblog.ikvm.net
- www.oracle.com
- blogs.technet.com
- krebsonsecurity.com
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- marc.info
- marc.info
- marc.info
- marc.info
- marc.info
- rhn.redhat.com
- rhn.redhat.com
- rhn.redhat.com
- www.debian.org
- www.securityfocus.com
- bugzilla.redhat.com
- weblog.ikvm.net
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- www.cisa.gov
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2012-0507 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data