CVE-2012-0710
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIBM DB2 9.1 before FP11, 9.5 before FP9, 9.7 before FP5, and 9.8 before FP4 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) via a crafted Distributed Relational Database Architecture (DRDA) request.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIBM DB2 versions 9.1, 9.5, 9.7, and 9.8 contain a denial of service vulnerability in the Distributed Relational Database Architecture (DRDA) protocol handler. Remote attackers can send specially crafted DRDA requests that cause the DB2 daemon to crash, resulting in service interruption.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 9.1= 9.5= 9.7= 9.8CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Partial
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed DB2 versionRun the command 'db2level' from a DB2 instance owner account or check the output of 'db2pd -version'Affected if Version reported is 9.1, 9.5, 9.7, or 9.8 (without the corresponding fix pack)
-
Verify DRDA protocol listener is activeRun 'db2pd -dbptmpin' or check DB2 configuration for the service name/port using 'get dbm cfg | grep SVCENAME' then verify the port is listening with 'netstat -an | grep <port>'Affected if DB2 is listening on a DRDA port (typically 50000 or configured SVCENAME) and responds to connections
-
Confirm network exposure of DB2 portCheck firewall rules or DB2 configuration parameter 'DISCOVER_INST' using 'get dbm cfg' and review whether the listener binds to exposed interfaces versus localhost onlyAffected if DB2 listener port is bound to 0.0.0.0 or an IP address accessible from untrusted networks, or firewall permits external access to the DB2 port
You are affected if you run DB2 version 9.1, 9.5, 9.7, or 9.8 without the corresponding fix packs AND your DRDA listener is network-accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the appropriate IBM DB2 fix packs (FP11 for v9.1, FP9 for v9.5, FP5 for v9.7, FP4 for v9.8) or later versions to address this vulnerability. Until patches are applied, restrict network access to DB2 listen ports using firewalls or network segmentation.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2012-0710 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2012-0710 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data